[gmx-developers] Can't understand DS_Check_Order()
David
spoel at xray.bmc.uu.se
Thu Aug 8 15:34:44 CEST 2002
On Thu, 2002-08-08 at 15:08, Vishal Vaidyanathan wrote:
> Hi ,
> I am unable to figure out how to use the set_nec() function correctly.
> The code in DS_Check_Order() in kernel/topdirs.c is:
>
> /*other stuff here*/
>
> do {
> d0=necessary[d][i++];
> if (DS_Search(DS,d0))
> return TRUE;
> } while(d0!=d_none);
>
> return FALSE;
> }
>
>
> and it seems to me it will return true if ANY of the necessary
> directives is present. Is that the way it's meant to be or is it supposed
> to check if ALL the necessary directives are present?
Hm, this was ten years ago... I think you need *all* prerequisites to be
on the dir stack, so I would expect something recursive...
>
> Thanks in advance and sorry if this is a silly question! :)
> Vishal
Never worry about silly questions. If it's not clear, it's not clear
enough.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> gmx-developers mailing list
> gmx-developers at gromacs.org
> http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-developers
> Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
> www interface or send it to gmx-developers-request at gromacs.org.
--
Groeten, David.
________________________________________________________________________
Dr. David van der Spoel, Biomedical center, Dept. of Biochemistry
Husargatan 3, Box 576, 75123 Uppsala, Sweden
phone: 46 18 471 4205 fax: 46 18 511 755
spoel at xray.bmc.uu.se spoel at gromacs.org http://zorn.bmc.uu.se/~spoel
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-developers
mailing list