[gmx-developers] Bug in g_cluster/gmx_cluster
Roman Affentranger
roman.affentranger at bc.biol.ethz.ch
Thu Jun 24 09:10:55 CEST 2004
Hi Berk
Thank you for your reply.
At 15:39 23.06.2004 +0200, you wrote:
>Looking at the code I guess you are right. But I could not reproduce the
>error.
The program runs ok, but the cluster centers that are written to
cluster.log/clusters.pdb are not the correct cluster centers.
>I had lots of trouble running g_cluster, as it often wrote an empty xpm file.
>I have worked on g_cluster several years ago, but after that there have
>been a lot of changes.
>Hopefully somebody else can fix this problem plus the writing of empty xpm
>files.
>
>>Apart from that, I think that the clustering method denoted "linkage" does
>>not represent a full linkage, but rather a single linkage clustering.
>
>I programmed this and I think it does what is advertized in the g_cluster
>-h help.
>So do you think (and if yes why) g_cluster does not do what is written in
>the help?
>Or is full linkage not what has been written in the help?
As far as I recall, in full linkage clustering a structure would be added
to a cluster if its distance to *all* other cluster members is below the
cutoff. What is advertised in the g_cluster -h help is correct where it
says "add a structure to a cluster when its distance to *any* element of
the cluster is less than cutoff" (to me as a non-native english speaker
this means that the distance to only one cluster member needs to be below
the cutoff for a structure to be added to a cluster. Correct me if I'm
wrong. At least that's what is done by the function 'gather', and this I
think is called single linkage clustering).
Cheers
Roman
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Roman Affentranger
Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich
Institute of Biochemistry
Schafmattstrasse 18
ETH Hoenggerberg HPM G 9.3
8093 Zurich
Switzerland
Phone: +41 1 632 31 39
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-developers
mailing list