[gmx-developers] rvec structure

[Nathan Moore]

Dear Berk and David,

Starting from a new source tree and making the modifications eliminated
the seg-fault error - I'm doing testing now - I'll let you know about the
results in a little while.  Thanks again for all the help!

Nathan

> Berk,
>
> I think another part of the source tree may have been corrupted - I'm
> rebuilding again this morning to see if the segfault (with no
> modification) is real.  Sorry to cry wolf.
>
> Nathan
>
>> Nathan Moore wrote:
>>
>>>Fellows,
>>>
>>>Allright, I pulled the 1.8 version of mvxvf off of CVS, and copied teh
>>>guts of move_x and move_f into the 3.2 version of mvxvf.c with the
>>>following substitutions:
>>>        replace "nsb->nprocs" with "nsb->nnodes"
>>>        replace "nsb->pid" with "nsb->nodeid"
>>>        include mpi.h library
>>>
>>>Source is below.
>>>
>>>At present the code still core dumps because of a segmentation fault in
>>>the do_pbc_first->mk_mshift->mk_grey function chain.
>>>
>>>Any idea why this is?  I've changed nothing excepte the source file
>>> below.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> It seems strange to me that this modification would cause such an error.
>> With an unmodified mvxvf.c it does not segfault?
>>
>> Berk.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> gmx-developers mailing list
>> gmx-developers at gromacs.org
>> http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-developers
>> Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
>> www interface or send it to gmx-developers-request at gromacs.org.
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> gmx-developers mailing list
> gmx-developers at gromacs.org
> http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-developers
> Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
> www interface or send it to gmx-developers-request at gromacs.org.
>