[gmx-developers] Cubic splines - again
mpuetz at de.ibm.com
Mon Aug 21 11:00:42 CEST 2006
I also have a question about the cubic spline formula used for potentials
As I understand it the spline formula employed by GROMACS enforces that
potentials and their second derivates are continuous at the tables sites,
but the first derivates, hence the forces computed from the tables, are
There is always a small discontinuity at the table sites for the first
derivatives and therefore the forces.
I stumbled a across this when I used Eric's kernel tester for BlueGene
I guess my question is: Do you really want a spline formula that makes the
forces discontinous ?
Wouldn't it actually make more sense to use a spline formulat that forces
the potential and
its first derivate to be continuous ? What's the rationale behind making
the second derivate
continuous anyway ?
Viele Grüsse / Best regards,
Dr. Mathias Pütz
IT Specialist for Application Perfomance
Deep Computing - Strategic Growth BusinessDeep
IBM Systems & Technology Group
e-mail: mpuetz at de.ibm.com
mobile: + 49-(0)160-7120602
fax: + 49-(0)6131-84-6660
IBM Deutschland GmbH
Hechtsheimer Str. 2 / Building 12
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-developers