[gmx-developers] Release of 3.3.4 and 4.0.1 RE: gmx-developers Digest, Vol 54, Issue 9
David van der Spoel
spoel at xray.bmc.uu.se
Thu Oct 16 17:22:06 CEST 2008
Jim Kress wrote:
> What will be the differences? Why not just release 4.0.1 and truncate the
> 3.3.x tree?
>
Many people are conservative about upgrade, even though the benefits are
obvious (look e.g. at the linux kernel).
Anyway, there are a few bug-fixes in the 3.3 tree, so we might as well
bundle it.
> Jim Kress
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: gmx-developers-bounces at gromacs.org
>> [mailto:gmx-developers-bounces at gromacs.org] On Behalf Of
>> gmx-developers-request at gromacs.org
>> Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2008 6:00 AM
>> To: gmx-developers at gromacs.org
>> Subject: gmx-developers Digest, Vol 54, Issue 9
>>
>> Send gmx-developers mailing list submissions to
>> gmx-developers at gromacs.org
>>
>> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>> http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-developers
>> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>> gmx-developers-request at gromacs.org
>>
>> You can reach the person managing the list at
>> gmx-developers-owner at gromacs.org
>>
>> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more
>> specific than "Re: Contents of gmx-developers digest..."
>>
>>
>> Today's Topics:
>>
>> 1. Re: Pointer arithmetic (Erik Lindahl)
>>
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> Message: 1
>> Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 13:46:01 +0200
>> From: Erik Lindahl <lindahl at cbr.su.se>
>> Subject: Re: [gmx-developers] Pointer arithmetic
>> To: Discussion list for GROMACS development
>> <gmx-developers at gromacs.org>
>> Message-ID: <4A4C5E1A-87EF-4EFE-B1DC-E9471BB0DA8D at cbr.su.se>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Oct 15, 2008, at 10:52 AM, David van der Spoel wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> it seems that newer C-libraries on Linux boxes are more
>> picky on how
>>> to treat memory and pointers. I have recently fixed some old code
>>> (mshift.c) containing pointer arithmetic in 4.0 which is used only
>>> when using particle decomposition. However the same problem
>> is in the
>>> 3.3 tree, I intend to fix it there as well. Are there other places
>>> where this is done?
>>>
>>> We should probably try to fix another few bugs from
>> bugzilla and then
>>> release 3.3.4 and 4.0.1.
>> Yeah, that's more or less what we expected.
>>
>> My plan is to wait until (after) the weekend, release 4.0.1,
>> and then also create binary packages. By then I should also
>> have been able to create makefiles for MSVC, and fix possible
>> compiler issues under windows.
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Erik
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> gmx-developers mailing list
>> gmx-developers at gromacs.org
>> http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-developers
>>
>>
>> End of gmx-developers Digest, Vol 54, Issue 9
>> *********************************************
>
> _______________________________________________
> gmx-developers mailing list
> gmx-developers at gromacs.org
> http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-developers
> Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
> www interface or send it to gmx-developers-request at gromacs.org.
--
David.
________________________________________________________________________
David van der Spoel, PhD, Professor of Biology
Dept. of Cell and Molecular Biology, Uppsala University.
Husargatan 3, Box 596, 75124 Uppsala, Sweden
phone: 46 18 471 4205 fax: 46 18 511 755
spoel at xray.bmc.uu.se spoel at gromacs.org http://folding.bmc.uu.se
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-developers
mailing list