[gmx-developers] gmx_mtop_t inconsistency with old .tpr files
Berk Hess
hess at cbr.su.se
Mon Nov 30 17:25:41 CET 2009
We can't do that, since these numbers have to match the contents of the
moltype entry.
Berk
Victor Rühle wrote:
> Hi Berk,
>
> thanks for the quick answer. The only thing I don't understand then is
> the t_block structure mtop.mols which contains at least the correct
> partitioning of atoms into molecules (also in the old tpr files).
>
> Since this data is there, wouldn't it be better to initialize the
> mtop.nmolblock.natoms_mol + mtop.nmolblock.nmol accordingly?
>
> Victor
>
> Berk Hess wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> The old tpr files do not contain information on molecular topologies,
>> so the only thing we can do is consider the whole system as one large
>> moleculetype.
>>
>> Berk
>>
>> Victor Rühle wrote:
>>> Dear all,
>>>
>>> I changed my code for reading .tpr files to read_tpx to get molecule
>>> names. When I use the tpr-file generated by a recent gromacs version,
>>> everything works fine.
>>>
>>> However when using older .tpr files (before molecule names were
>>> stored), there is an inconsistency in the structures:
>>>
>>> mtop.nmolblock = 1
>>> mtop.nmoltype = 1
>>>
>>> mtop.molblock[0].nmol = 1
>>> mtop.mols.nr = real number of molecules
>>>
>>> Is this a bug or a feature? As one can see, at least some molecule
>>> information is still there but just the new structures are not set up
>>> properly. If I run tpbconv, it puts all atoms in a single molecule.
>>>
>>> Possible workarounds are to rerun grompp to create new tpr files or
>>> change my read function to compensate for this problem. Both solutions
>>> are not very nice.
>>>
>>> Did anybody else had a similar problem?
>>>
>>> Thanks for your help,
>>> Victor
>>
>
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-developers
mailing list