[gmx-developers] gmx_mtop_t inconsistency with old .tpr files
Victor Rühle
ruehle at mpip-mainz.mpg.de
Mon Nov 30 18:26:23 CET 2009
We're developing a package for coarse-graining applications which also
uses the gromacs libraries. With molfile_plugin.h missing, compiling
against the gromacs installation is not possible, that's why the file
should be installed.
For such a scenario, there is an additional problem with malformated
include directives in the gromacs headers (I reported this some time
ago), however this can be solved by some unhandy CPPFLAGS even though
GROMACS headers are in standard include directory.
Cheers,
Victor
Roland Schulz wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 11:44 AM, Victor Rühle <ruehle at mpip-mainz.mpg.de
> <mailto:ruehle at mpip-mainz.mpg.de>> wrote:
>
>
> p.s.: in the dev branch, the file molfile_plugin.h is not copied
> during installation
>
>
> why does this matter?
> This file is a VMD include file and only included in the GROMACS source
> to avoid a dependency on VMD at compile time. But it is not an external
> interface to GROMACS. So I don't know why anyone would need that include
> file.
>
> Roland
>
>
>
>
> Berk Hess wrote:
>
> We can't do that, since these numbers have to match the contents
> of the
> moltype entry.
>
> Berk
>
> Victor Rühle wrote:
>
> Hi Berk,
>
> thanks for the quick answer. The only thing I don't
> understand then is
> the t_block structure mtop.mols which contains at least the
> correct
> partitioning of atoms into molecules (also in the old tpr
> files).
>
> Since this data is there, wouldn't it be better to
> initialize the
> mtop.nmolblock.natoms_mol + mtop.nmolblock.nmol accordingly?
>
> Victor
>
> Berk Hess wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> The old tpr files do not contain information on
> molecular topologies,
> so the only thing we can do is consider the whole system
> as one large
> moleculetype.
>
> Berk
>
> Victor Rühle wrote:
>
> Dear all,
>
> I changed my code for reading .tpr files to read_tpx
> to get molecule
> names. When I use the tpr-file generated by a recent
> gromacs version,
> everything works fine.
>
> However when using older .tpr files (before molecule
> names were
> stored), there is an inconsistency in the structures:
>
> mtop.nmolblock = 1
> mtop.nmoltype = 1
>
> mtop.molblock[0].nmol = 1
> mtop.mols.nr <http://mtop.mols.nr> = real number of
> molecules
>
> Is this a bug or a feature? As one can see, at least
> some molecule
> information is still there but just the new
> structures are not set up
> properly. If I run tpbconv, it puts all atoms in a
> single molecule.
>
> Possible workarounds are to rerun grompp to create
> new tpr files or
> change my read function to compensate for this
> problem. Both solutions
> are not very nice.
>
> Did anybody else had a similar problem?
>
> Thanks for your help,
> Victor
>
>
>
> --
> gmx-developers mailing list
> gmx-developers at gromacs.org <mailto:gmx-developers at gromacs.org>
> http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-developers
> Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www
> interface or send it to gmx-developers-request at gromacs.org
> <mailto:gmx-developers-request at gromacs.org>.
>
>
>
>
> --
> ORNL/UT Center for Molecular Biophysics cmb.ornl.gov <http://cmb.ornl.gov>
> 865-241-1537, ORNL PO BOX 2008 MS6309
>
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-developers
mailing list