[gmx-developers] latest dev version
Erik Lindahl
lindahl at cbr.su.se
Fri Sep 18 19:31:53 CEST 2009
Hi,
I think ia64 is the *only* platform where we haven't verified this
yet. On IBM, the C loops got as fast as fortran once we added
"restrict" modifier keywords (C99) to the function call. I just
haven't had time to do that for the normal kernels yet since I need to
hack a gmx_restrict keyword, just because some vendor hasn't adapted
to a 10-year-old-ISO-standard yet (Read: Microsoft).
Cheers,
Erik
On Sep 18, 2009, at 4:55 PM, Berk Hess wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I renamed the variable (the new name is also more explanatory).
>
> But on what kind of system are you using a fortran compiler?
> With the git version fortran should (nearly) never be faster from
> what I
> understood.
> We will soon completely get rid of all fortran code in Gromacs.
>
> Berk
>
> Alexander Herz wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> in the file xdrd.c a variable called "ia64" is used.
>> Trying to compile this with fortran kernels on the LRZ in munich
>> gave me
>> a compiler error.
>> Apparently "ia64" is a reserved word and should not be used as name.
>>
>> Alex
>> _______________________________________________
>> gmx-developers mailing list
>> gmx-developers at gromacs.org
>> http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-developers
>> Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
>> www interface or send it to gmx-developers-request at gromacs.org.
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> gmx-developers mailing list
> gmx-developers at gromacs.org
> http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-developers
> Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
> www interface or send it to gmx-developers-request at gromacs.org.
>
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-developers
mailing list