[gmx-developers] latest dev version

Erik Lindahl lindahl at cbr.su.se
Fri Sep 18 19:31:53 CEST 2009


Hi,

I think ia64 is the *only* platform where we haven't verified this  
yet. On IBM, the C loops got as fast as fortran once we added  
"restrict" modifier keywords (C99) to the function call. I just  
haven't had time to do that for the normal kernels yet since I need to  
hack a gmx_restrict keyword, just because some vendor hasn't adapted  
to a 10-year-old-ISO-standard yet (Read: Microsoft).

Cheers,

Erik

On Sep 18, 2009, at 4:55 PM, Berk Hess wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I renamed the variable (the new name is also more explanatory).
>
> But on what kind of system are you using a fortran compiler?
> With the git version fortran should (nearly) never be faster from  
> what I
> understood.
> We will soon completely get rid of all fortran code in Gromacs.
>
> Berk
>
> Alexander Herz wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> in the file xdrd.c a variable called "ia64" is used.
>> Trying to compile this with fortran kernels on the LRZ in munich  
>> gave me
>> a compiler error.
>> Apparently "ia64" is a reserved word and should not be used as name.
>>
>> Alex
>> _______________________________________________
>> gmx-developers mailing list
>> gmx-developers at gromacs.org
>> http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-developers
>> Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
>> www interface or send it to gmx-developers-request at gromacs.org.
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> gmx-developers mailing list
> gmx-developers at gromacs.org
> http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-developers
> Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
> www interface or send it to gmx-developers-request at gromacs.org.
>




More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-developers mailing list