Res: [gmx-developers] MC with GROMACS
André Assunção S. T. Ribeiro
aastr at yahoo.com.br
Fri Dec 10 11:14:30 CET 2010
The latest coding was done with version 4.5.3. I have not merged my git
repository with GROMACS for quite a while (the last time I tried somethings did
not work). I will send a link with the updated and merged git repository as soon
as possible, probably by monday.
I will try to keep the code as clean as possible (with few modifications to MD
code), which also means it wont be as fast as it could. I would love if someone
could take a look at the code and see if it could be easily integrated with the
I totally agree with the specialized discussion groups.
De: René Pool <r.pool at vu.nl>
Para: Discussion list for GROMACS development <gmx-developers at gromacs.org>
Enviadas: Sexta-feira, 10 de Dezembro de 2010 7:54:27
Assunto: Re: [gmx-developers] MC with GROMACS
Nice work André!
What version of gromacs are you working with? (if I remmeber correctly, it was
I'd be happy to make the GCMC module compatible with that version as well as
make it compatible for the latest version of gmx. Keep in mind that for now it
only works for the LJ system, but it's the first step towards GCMC with 'real'
I agree with Michael that it would be a good idea to have a separate discussion
group for more specialized stuff. I have no idea how many people are interested
in gmx-mc? If the interest is too low, a separate discussion group could be
Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
De Boelelaan 1081a
1081HV AMSTERDAM, the Netherlands
E: r.pool at few.vu.nl
T: +31 20 59 83714
F: +31 20 59 87653
Shirts, Michael (mrs5pt) wrote:
> So, this reminds me about having separate focused discussion groups on
> important general topics for future and current development in Gromacs like
> Monte Carlo and free energy calculations. How are any plans for this going
> right now? It would be a shame if potentially good contributions like this
> ended up not being incorporated because they were written in a way that made
> it hard to integrate in, or if multiple people are working independently on
> the same functionality in an incompatible way.
> I'm willing to moderate a free energy calculation group. It can be as
> simple as a separate gmx-XXXXX at gromacs.org mailing address, and wouldn't
> necessarily need to be publically indexed. How difficult would this be to
> set up?
> Michael Shirts
> Assistant Professor
> Department of Chemical Engineering
> University of Virginia
> michael.shirts at virginia.edu
>> From: "André Assunção S. T. Ribeiro" <aastr at yahoo.com.br>
>> Reply-To: Discussion list for GROMACS development
<gmx-developers at gromacs.org>
>> Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2010 17:59:50 -0500
>> To: "gmx-developers at gromacs.org" <gmx-developers at gromacs.org>
>> Subject: [gmx-developers] MC with GROMACS
>> Dear all,
>> I have implemented the concerted rotations approach of Ulmschneider &
>> Jorgensen (JCP,2003) for MC moves of peptides. That has been shown to be very
>> efficient coupled with GBSA solvation. This adds to already implemented
>> routines for simple MC moves, such as bond stretching and angle bending.
>> I have tested the algorithm for detailed balance and also performed
>> simulations of alanine polypeptides with GBSA solvation, starting from fully
>> extended configurations. The results obtained with MD and MC are equivalent.
-- gmx-developers mailing list
gmx-developers at gromacs.org
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www interface or
send it to gmx-developers-request at gromacs.org.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-developers