[gmx-developers] Nonconsecutive shake groups?
Shirts, Michael (mrs5pt)
mrs5pt at eservices.virginia.edu
Mon Sep 27 07:49:09 CEST 2010
Just checking - currently, is there no way to have constraints on blocks of
nonconsecutive atoms? For example, with the following topology, with
constraints set to h-bonds:
[ atoms ]
; nr type resi res atom cgnr charge mass typeB
chargeB
1 ca 1 MET C1 1 -0.03810 12.01000
2 ca 1 MET C2 2 -0.02890 12.01000
3 ca 1 MET C3 3 -0.17620 12.01000
4 ca 1 MET C4 4 -0.23470 12.01000
5 ca 1 MET C5 5 -0.17410 12.01000
6 ca 1 MET C6 6 0.15910 12.01000
7 c 1 MET C7 7 0.64940 12.01000
8 c3 1 MET C8 8 0.12850 12.01000
9 o 1 MET O1 9 -0.54700 16.00000
10 oh 1 MET O2 10 -0.49020 16.00000
11 os 1 MET O3 11 -0.44230 16.00000
12 ha 1 MET H1 12 0.16160 1.00800
13 ha 1 MET H2 13 0.15640 1.00800
14 ha 1 MET H3 14 0.15790 1.00800
15 ha 1 MET H4 15 0.14070 1.00800
16 h1 1 MET H5 16 0.06060 1.00800
17 h1 1 MET H6 17 0.04650 1.00800
18 h1 1 MET H7 18 0.04620 1.00800
19 ho 1 MET H8 19 0.42460 1.00800
it started to generate a lot of "Double sids" errors as soon as mdrun
started, apparently because the first constraint block was interpreted as
being from 1 to 12.
1) it would be nice to be able to have constraint blocks including
nonconsecutive atoms (I think I had a conversation about this with David van
der Spoel at some point, but can't find it in the gmx-developer's archive),
since some molecule manipulation programs output chemicals in this format,
and it might be a pain to rewrite it?
2) at the least, grommp should give a more informative warning, instead of
getting to mdrun with lots of "double sids" error that don't describe what's
going on.
3) or am I doing something wrong?
Thanks!
~~~~~~~~~~~~
Michael Shirts
Assistant Professor
Department of Chemical Engineering
University of Virginia
michael.shirts at virginia.edu
(434)-243-1821
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-developers
mailing list