[gmx-developers] Qhop-implementation: integration of motion not correct
Erik Marklund
erikm at xray.bmc.uu.se
Wed Jan 26 19:41:25 CET 2011
Erik Marklund skrev 2011-01-18 22.01:
> Hi,
>
> I am implementing the Qhop protocaol in gromacs. I use a special
> topology for the water molecules with three extra virtual particles
> representing the hydronium hydrogens. If a molecule is in the water
> state the nonbonded parameters for the virtual particles are turned
> off (q=0, LJ-parameters are always zero). Thus, you'd expect them to
> behave just like ordinary spc, which has the same parameters for the
> water part of the molecule. However, it does not. I compared
> simulations with my special water in bulk phase (all molecules in the
> water state) and simulations with ordinary spc. Energies, pressures
> and such thigs are almost identical between the simulations, but the
> diffusion coefficient is roughly tree times higher with my special
> water than in a box of spc. Note that there are no extra calls to
> do_force() or update functions. Do any of you have any idea of why
> this happens?
>
> I'm using leap-frog with Nosé-Hoover (or no) for T-coupling and
> Parinello-Rahman for P-coupling.
>
> Sincerely,
>
Just thought I'd say I have this down now. It was entirely unrelated to
the mdp options. One of those pesky indexing errors we've all learned to
hate as programmers.
Thanks for all the input.
--
-----------------------------------------------
Erik Marklund, PhD student
Dept. of Cell and Molecular Biology, Uppsala University.
Husargatan 3, Box 596, 75124 Uppsala, Sweden
phone: +46 18 471 4537 fax: +46 18 511 755
erikm at xray.bmc.uu.se http://folding.bmc.uu.se/
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-developers
mailing list