[gmx-developers] Mails rejected with "The message's content type was not explicitly allowed"
Rossen Apostolov
rossen at kth.se
Thu Aug 23 08:45:42 CEST 2012
On 2012-08-21 22.08, Szilárd Páll wrote:
> I'm quite puzzled why is the gmx-users still rejecting non-plain text
> messages. There has not been a single opinion in favor of keeping the
> mailing list crippled.
Erik wrote already in this thread why he changed the setting.
>
> So once again, Rossen (or someone else with the appropriate
> credentials), please revert the setting!
Check with him on that.
Rossen
>
> --
> Szilárd
>
>
> On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 3:19 PM, Berk Hess <hess at kth.se
> <mailto:hess at kth.se>> wrote:
>
> On 07/20/2012 01:55 PM, Justin Lemkul wrote:
>
>
>
> On 7/19/12 6:56 PM, Mark Abraham wrote:
>
> On 5/07/2012 11:24 PM, Rossen Apostolov wrote:
>
> Dear all,
>
> Recently the Gromacs mailing lists have been used for
> sending spam and
> viruses, and thus now only plain text messages are
> accepted.
>
> If you have received rejected mails saying "The
> message's content type was not
> explicitly allowed" it means that you have used in
> your mail special styles or
> formatting (e.g. bold typeface, colors etc.).
>
> Check your email client settings about how to send
> messages as plain text,
> e.g. in GMail make sure to click on "Compose -> Plain
> Text". Check also
> whether a formatted signature is added.
>
> Attachments are also not allowed but you could include
> links for downloads.
>
> Rossen
>
>
>
> Bump.
>
> I'm happy banning attachments (there's lots of free upload
> space out there), but
> think that explicitly requiring plain text email is a
> significant barrier to
> participation. Some web mail clients don't permit a
> non-HTML mime type - that's
> not our fault but we have to live in that jungle. Some
> people will walk away
> without bothering to find out if they can configure plain
> text email. Others
> will judge the technical competence of the team on their
> ability to run the
> mailing list. If we need to outsource it somewhere, we
> should do that.
>
> Mark
>
>
>
> I agree with Mark here. It seems to me that traffic to the
> list has been down for a couple of weeks relative to normal,
> but there may be other factors for that. What I do know is
> that I'm getting increasing amounts of emails to my personal
> inbox starting with "I can't post to the Gromacs list, so I'm
> sending this to you..." That's an increased burden I'm not
> willing to bear. I'm all for community contributions (you all
> know that ;) but as soon as it becomes my responsibility to
> handle Gromacs issues, I'm less inclined.
>
> -Justin
>
> I think everyone agrees that we need to accept html mails.
>
> The question is if we need some filter and when Rossen, or someone
> else, has time to fix this.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Berk
>
>
>
> --
> gmx-developers mailing list
> gmx-developers at gromacs.org <mailto:gmx-developers at gromacs.org>
> http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-developers
> Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www
> interface or send it to gmx-developers-request at gromacs.org
> <mailto:gmx-developers-request at gromacs.org>.
>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://maillist.sys.kth.se/pipermail/gromacs.org_gmx-developers/attachments/20120823/085c5c2f/attachment.html>
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-developers
mailing list