[gmx-developers] Checkpoint run will start without checkpoint file

Tsjerk Wassenaar tsjerkw at gmail.com
Thu Jan 12 08:33:13 CET 2012


It's pretty trivial to test whether an option was specified explicitly. But
the reason for the current behaviour is that you can now use the same
command for the first and any following in a series of runs, e.g. on a
cluster. I find this pretty convenient.



On Jan 12, 2012 6:07 AM, <chris.neale at utoronto.ca> wrote:

I'd certainly like the requested behaviour, and it seems to me that
anything is possible with an if-statement.

Thank you,

Quoting Bogdan Costescu <bcostescu at gmail.com>: > On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at
21:50, David Chalmers  <...
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use thewww interface
or send it to gmx-developers-request@**gromacs.org<gmx-developers-request at gromacs.org>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://maillist.sys.kth.se/pipermail/gromacs.org_gmx-developers/attachments/20120112/ffab423c/attachment.html>

More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-developers mailing list