[gmx-developers] Re: abstract type convention

[Peter Kasson]

My understanding is that our c++ convention is to use the gmx namespace,
right?
http://www.gromacs.org/index.php?title=Developer_Zone/Programming_Guide/Allowed_C%2B%2B_Features

The example there of gmx::gmx_unique_ptr does seem a little redundant.  If
we're using the gmx namespace, then it would seem we'd want to ditch the
gmx prefix.  Is that what you're suggesting, Berk?

Thanks,
--Peter


----------------------------------------------------------------------
Peter Kasson, MD, PhD
Assistant Professor
Departments of Molecular Physiology and Biological Physics
and of Biomedical Engineering
University of Virginia
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://maillist.sys.kth.se/pipermail/gromacs.org_gmx-developers/attachments/20130610/ed77b784/attachment.html>