[gmx-developers] Re: abstract type convention

Peter Kasson kasson at virginia.edu
Mon Jun 10 14:49:12 CEST 2013

My understanding is that our c++ convention is to use the gmx namespace,

The example there of gmx::gmx_unique_ptr does seem a little redundant.  If
we're using the gmx namespace, then it would seem we'd want to ditch the
gmx prefix.  Is that what you're suggesting, Berk?


Peter Kasson, MD, PhD
Assistant Professor
Departments of Molecular Physiology and Biological Physics
and of Biomedical Engineering
University of Virginia
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://maillist.sys.kth.se/pipermail/gromacs.org_gmx-developers/attachments/20130610/ed77b784/attachment.html>

More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-developers mailing list