[gmx-developers] Running Gromacs on GPUs on multiple machines

Mark Abraham mark.j.abraham at gmail.com
Thu May 29 22:49:01 CEST 2014

On May 29, 2014 8:41 PM, "Vedran Miletić" <rivanvx at gmail.com> wrote:
> 2014-05-29 20:36 GMT+02:00 Mark Abraham <mark.j.abraham at gmail.com>:
> > The hash function is there, and is used for communicator splitting, but
> > not (yet) implement gmx_hostname_num in release-5-0.
> >
> > Mark
> You are right, hostnames are _not_ ordered. I could probably change that.

Good idea, we may not fix this in 4.6.6. Please file a bug report, so we
remember to fix this for 5.0.

> Nevertheless, is the patch from bug 1135 the code that should fix the
> issue? Or does it require more work?

There's a few separate issues needing work, including better reporting and
use of the hash, but they'd go into 5.0 at the earliest.


> Regards,
> Vedran
> --
> Gromacs Developers mailing list
> * Please search the archive at
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-developers_List before
> * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
> * For (un)subscribe requests visit
> https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-developers
or send a mail to gmx-developers-request at gromacs.org.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://maillist.sys.kth.se/pipermail/gromacs.org_gmx-developers/attachments/20140529/3a891276/attachment-0001.html>

More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-developers mailing list