[gmx-developers] Conserved energy drifts more with shorter time steps
Peter Ahlström
Peter.Ahlstrom at hb.se
Sun Jun 7 21:51:25 CEST 2015
Hello,
I've been following the discussion for a while and came just to think
about another problem:
What about the PME - isn't that messing up the energy conservation?
I believe that that's also a non-conservative force -or am I completely
wrong?
Cheers,
Peter
Dr Peter Ahlström
University of Borås
SE-501 90 Borås
Sweden
+46 33 435 4675
>>> David van der Spoel <spoel at xray.bmc.uu.se> 06/07/15 5:58 PM >>>
On 02/06/15 13:45, Shirts, Michael R. (mrs5pt) wrote:
>> How do we run more NVE than with the settings below?
>
> tcoupl = Nose-Hoover
>
>
> Would make it not NVE.
>
> Do you mean the conserved quantity isn't conserved? Energy certainly
> won't be conserved with Nose-Hoover.
Disturbing altogether.
Is there any reason that md-vv would be better than the md integrator
for energy conservation?
>
> Best,
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~
> Michael Shirts
> Associate Professor
> Department of Chemical Engineering
> University of Virginia
> michael.shirts at virginia.edu
> (434) 243-1821
>
>
>
> On 6/2/15, 7:22 AM, "David van der Spoel" <spoel at xray.bmc.uu.se>
wrote:
>
>> On 02/06/15 12:47, Berk Hess wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> So this is not using SETTLE or LINCS?
>>> With SETTLE this is a known issue.
>> No this is flexible organic molecules at contant volume.
>>
>>>
>>> Did you try running NVE?
>> How do we run more NVE than with the settings below?
>>
>>
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>> Berk
>>>
>>> On 2015-06-02 12:43, David van der Spoel wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> this is in between a user and a developer query. We find that for
>>>> flexible liquid simulations using gromacs 5.0.4/single precision
the
>>>> energy conservation gets WORSE with decreasing time step. A plot
>>>> showing this is in
>>>> http://folding.bmc.uu.se/images/Econserved-timestep.xvg or
>>>> http://folding.bmc.uu.se/images/Econserved-timestep.pdf
>>>>
>>>> MDP settings
>>>> coulombtype = PME
>>>> coulomb-modifier = Potential-shift
>>>> rcoulomb-switch = 0
>>>> rcoulomb = 1.1
>>>> epsilon-r = 1
>>>> epsilon-rf = inf
>>>> vdw-type = PME
>>>> vdw-modifier = Potential-shift
>>>> rvdw-switch = 0
>>>> rvdw = 1.1
>>>> tcoupl = Nose-Hoover
>>>> nsttcouple = 10
>>>> nh-chain-length = 1
>>>> pcoupl = No
>>>> ref-t: 298.15
>>>> tau-t: 0.5
>>>>
>>>> Any clues whether we are doing something wrong? Or is there a bug?
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> David van der Spoel, Ph.D., Professor of Biology
>> Dept. of Cell & Molec. Biol., Uppsala University.
>> Box 596, 75124 Uppsala, Sweden. Phone: +46184714205.
>> spoel at xray.bmc.uu.se http://folding.bmc.uu.se
>> --
>> Gromacs Developers mailing list
>>
>> * Please search the archive at
>> http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-developers_List
before
>> posting!
>>
>> * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
>>
>> * For (un)subscribe requests visit
>>
https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-developers
>> or send a mail to gmx-developers-request at gromacs.org.
>
--
David van der Spoel, Ph.D., Professor of Biology
Dept. of Cell & Molec. Biol., Uppsala University.
Box 596, 75124 Uppsala, Sweden. Phone: +46184714205.
spoel at xray.bmc.uu.se http://folding.bmc.uu.se
--
Gromacs Developers mailing list
* Please search the archive at
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-developers_List before
posting!
* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
* For (un)subscribe requests visit
https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-developers
or send a mail to gmx-developers-request at gromacs.org.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://maillist.sys.kth.se/pipermail/gromacs.org_gmx-developers/attachments/20150607/1bd9c16f/attachment.html>
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-developers
mailing list