[gmx-developers] Random number blues
mark.j.abraham at gmail.com
Thu Apr 21 13:16:15 CEST 2016
Chiefly reproducibility - multiple implementations of the standard aren't.
Particularly for new code, we have some quite nice Doxygen documentation
and machinery to build the latest version and make it available via
http://manual.gromacs.org/documentation/. It would be good for us all to
remember to think of that first, and ask each other questions that remain
On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 12:37 PM David van der Spoel <spoel at xray.bmc.uu.se>
> just finding out that gmx_rng_t has been replaced by C++.
> Is there any reason to use the new gromacs code rather than the C++11
> built-in one for simple random numbers?
> David van der Spoel, Ph.D., Professor of Biology
> Dept. of Cell & Molec. Biol., Uppsala University.
> Box 596, 75124 Uppsala, Sweden. Phone: +46184714205.
> spoel at xray.bmc.uu.se http://folding.bmc.uu.se
> Gromacs Developers mailing list
> * Please search the archive at
> http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-developers_List before
> * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
> * For (un)subscribe requests visit
> or send a mail to gmx-developers-request at gromacs.org.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-developers