[gmx-developers] GCC for 2017
roland.schulz at intel.com
Tue Apr 26 01:06:48 CEST 2016
I think we should require CUDA 6.5 so that we don’t have to work-around missing C++11 in CUDA anymore. If we anyhow require that we wouldn’t exclude any CUDA version because CUDA 6.5 supports GCC 4.8.
From: gromacs.org_gmx-developers-bounces at maillist.sys.kth.se [mailto:gromacs.org_gmx-developers-bounces at maillist.sys.kth.se] On Behalf Of Mark Abraham
Sent: Monday, April 25, 2016 2:50 PM
To: gmx-developers at gromacs.org
Subject: Re: [gmx-developers] GCC for 2017
4.8 seems reasonable to me, but I think we want to consider which CUDA versions(s) that would exclude - how old they are and whether that saves us any work.
On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 12:36 AM Schulz, Roland <roland.schulz at intel.com<mailto:roland.schulz at intel.com>> wrote:
Any idea what the required GCC version for 2017 is going to be? Based on Erik's suggestion a while back it would be 4.8 (Ubuntu 14.04). This would have full C++11 but has more bugs than what's desirable for improved productivity.
Asking because I'm hitting one of those bugs in threading and wondering whether I need a work-around.
Gromacs Developers mailing list
* Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-developers_List before posting!
* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
* For (un)subscribe requests visit
https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-developers or send a mail to gmx-developers-request at gromacs.org<mailto:gmx-developers-request at gromacs.org>.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-developers