[gmx-developers] is gmx membed working in release-2016?
mark.j.abraham at gmail.com
Thu Jun 30 15:21:42 CEST 2016
Actually I made one already - https://redmine.gromacs.org/issues/1998
On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 1:09 PM Mark Abraham <mark.j.abraham at gmail.com>
> Thanks very much - a redmine would be great!
> On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 12:55 PM Groenhof, Gerrit <ggroenh at gwdg.de> wrote:
>> INdeed. my example worked for 5.1, but fails in 20016-beta.... I tried
>> PME and cut-off, but both fail in nb searching, suggesting that system is
>> Note that because energy exclusions are needed, Verlet scheme is not
>> working, and I used group instead.
>> Shall I upload to red mine, or send input (small system) via email?
>> *From:* gromacs.org_gmx-developers-bounces at maillist.sys.kth.se [
>> gromacs.org_gmx-developers-bounces at maillist.sys.kth.se] on behalf of
>> Mark Abraham [mark.j.abraham at gmail.com]
>> *Sent:* Thursday, June 30, 2016 1:24 PM
>> *To:* Discussion list for GROMACS development
>> *Subject:* [gmx-developers] is gmx membed working in release-2016?
>> I heard a rumour that gmx membed is broken in release-2016 branch, but
>> I've never used it. Does anybody have (know of anyone with) a setup that
>> used to work?
>> Gromacs Developers mailing list
>> * Please search the archive at
>> http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-developers_List before
>> * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
>> * For (un)subscribe requests visit
>> or send a mail to gmx-developers-request at gromacs.org.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-developers