[gmx-developers] KNL usage and mcdram
hess at kth.se
Fri Sep 22 11:44:49 CEST 2017
GROMACS simulations will usually completely fit in MCDRAM. So cache
configuration should be ok. I don't recall if there is some small
overhead to cache mode, in which case it would be better to use MCDRAM
as (the only) memory.
On 22/09/17 10:28 , Åke Sandgren wrote:
> Quick question, does gromacs currently take advantage of explicit use of
> mcdram on KNL nodes?
> I.e., when it's not configure as cache that is.
> Didn't see anything obvious during confiugure.
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-developers