[gmx-developers] Non Equilibrium alchemy implementation in gromacs
Michael R Shirts
Michael.Shirts at Colorado.EDU
Thu Dec 13 14:43:06 CET 2018
> REM question: how does gromacs implement H-REM? namely, are
topology/parameter
arrays exchanged or the replica exchange concerns (like in ORAC) only
specific
scaling factors (e.g .factors for torsional scaling, 14 scaling, intra
scaling, inter scaling etc. etc.) with invariant topology throughout
the GE?
Currently, the coordinates are exchanged. It does assume the topology is the same, with only parameters changing, though there is quite a bit of flexibility in defining parameters (i.e. some atoms off at one endpoint, other atoms off at the other endpoint).
> ALCHEMY question: when electrostatic of a solute molecule are turned
off no longer interacting with the solvent, are the *intramolecular*
electrostatic interactions also scaled? namely, if (e.g.)
lambda_q=0.5, do two atomic charges on the solute interact with a 0.25
scaling
factor? And if so, how does this get corrected when calcuting solvation
energies?
Both area implemented. Not sure what you mean when you say "corrected". Either method gives a valid Hamiltonian that is smoothly interpolated between lambda=0 and lambda=1; clearly, they are different Hamiltonians with different behaviors, and the equations are given in full detail in the manual.
> The idea is to transpose the ORAC hybrid OpenMP/MPI implementation for
NUMA architectures (which I wrote) to gromacs.
This sounds complicated. I cannot speak to this. Other people may be able to.
Best,
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Michael Shirts
Associate Professor
michael.shirts at colorado.edu
http://www.colorado.edu/lab/shirtsgroup/
Phone: (303) 735-7860
Office: JSCBB C123
Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering
University of Colorado Boulder
On 12/13/18, 6:32 AM, "gromacs.org_gmx-developers-bounces at maillist.sys.kth.se on behalf of Piero Procacci" <gromacs.org_gmx-developers-bounces at maillist.sys.kth.se on behalf of piero.procacci at unifi.it> wrote:
Dear colleagues
I would like to implement non equilibrium work (NEW) alchemical
methods for solvation and binding free energy calculations in gromacs
The idea is to transpose the ORAC hybrid OpenMP/MPI implementation for
NUMA architectures (which I wrote) to gromacs. A NEW calculation is
done in two steps:
i) a H-REM simulation where the initial thermodynamic state is
canonically
sampled (e.g. fully coupled solute/ligand or fully decoupled
solute/ligand)
ii) starting from a representative sample of these canonical
configurations, a
swarm of fast annihilation or growth NE trajectories (typically few
hundreds) are launched in parallel on the MPI layer. Each trajectory
can be n-threaded on the OpenMP layer.
As I have no experience (as contributor) in the gromacs code, before
embarking in this task I would like to get some info regarding
the current HREM and alchemical implementation in gromacs.
REM question: how does gromacs implement H-REM? namely, are
topology/parameter
arrays exchanged or the replica exchange concerns (like in ORAC) only
specific
scaling factors (e.g .factors for torsional scaling, 14 scaling, intra
scaling, inter scaling etc. etc.) with invariant topology throughout
the GE?
ALCHEMY question: when electrostatic of a solute molecule are turned
off no longer interacting with the solvent, are the *intramolecular*
electrostatic interactions also scaled? namely, if (e.g.)
lambda_q=0.5, do two atomic charges on the solute interact with a 0.25
scaling
factor? And if so, how does this get corrected when calcuting solvation
energies?
Thank you in advance for your help
Piero Procacci
--
Gromacs Developers mailing list
* Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-developers_List before posting!
* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
* For (un)subscribe requests visit
https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-developers or send a mail to gmx-developers-request at gromacs.org.
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-developers
mailing list