[gmx-users] problem with energy minimization
hugo verli
hugo at acd.ufrj.br
Thu Dec 13 13:11:20 CET 2001
> On Wed, 12 Dec 2001, Geraudis Mustelier wrote:
>
> >Hi
> >
> >I would like to refine a model obtained with modeling by homology
> technique
> >from X-ray structures. So, I am treating to do an energy minimization.
> The
> >parameter values in .mdp file are:
>
>
>
> >;
> >cpp = /lib/cpp
> >define = -DPOSRES -DFLEX_SPC
> add this ^^^^^^^^^^
>
Hi,
I'm having the same problem that Geraudis mention. I did try the define sugested
by David but I still have the following error:
Step = 218, Dmax = 2.84e-05 nm, Epot = -2.74076e+05 Fmax = 5.35193e+02
Step = 220, Dmax = 1.70e-05 nm, Epot = -2.74076e+05 Fmax = 5.09737e+02
Step = 221, Dmax = 2.04e-05 nm, Epot = -2.74076e+05 Fmax = 4.78996e+02
Step = 226, Dmax = 1.53e-06 nm, Epot = -2.74076e+05 Fmax = 4.76698e+02
Stepsize too small Converged to machine precision,
but not to the requested precision (100)
writing lowest energy coordinates.
Maximum force: 4.78996e+02
STEEPEST DESCENTS did not converge in 227 steps
Potential Energy = -2.74076e+05g
Conjugated Gradients did not converged the structure under 200kj. My .mdp file
to this run is:
cpp = /lib/cpp
define = -DPOSRES -DFLEX_SPC
constraints = none
integrator = steep
nsteps = 10000
;
; Energy minimizing stuff
;
emtol = 100
emstep = 0.00001
nstcomm = 1
ns_type = grid
rlist = 1.5
rcoulomb = 1.5
rvdw = 1.5
Tcoupl = no
Pcoupl = no
gen_vel = no
It is possible to achieve lower gradients?
Thanks in advance for any help,
Hugo.
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users
mailing list