[gmx-users] more questions
K.A.Feenstra
k.a.feenstra at chem.rug.nl
Tue Oct 9 09:40:57 CEST 2001
David van der Spoel wrote:
>
> On Tue, 9 Oct 2001, Daan van Aalten wrote:
> >
> >Once the size limit on PRODRG is gone, one should be able to build entire
> >topologies for protein which contain as much of these modifications as you
> >want. Perhaps you can test a small section of your protein (< 100 atoms)
> >with this chromophore in the middle? If it works I'll try to free some
> >time to up the size limit to 10000 or so.
>
> Obviously most users would really welcome this. Hope your algorithm scales
> reasonably.
And if it really works well, we should consider it as a replacement
for pdb2gmx, maybe for GROMACS 4.0... :) Or maybe, to use it as a
starting point for a complete re-write of pdb2gmx, which we would need
to do at some time anyway... ;)
That is, if Daan also thinks that would be a good idea?
--
Groetjes,
Anton
_____________ _____________________________________________________
| | |
| _ _ ___,| Anton Feenstra Dept. of Biophysical Chemistry|
| / \ / \'| | | anton at chem.rug.nl University of Groningen|
|( | )| | | +31 50 363 4327 Nijenborgh 4 9747 AG Groningen|
| \_/ \_/ | | | http://md.chem.rug.nl/~anton The Netherlands|
| | "Microsecond Here I Come" (P.J. Van Maaren) |
|_____________|_____________________________________________________|
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users
mailing list