[gmx-users] Bad energy conservation.

Ram'on Garc'ia Fern'andez ramon at jl1.quim.ucm.es
Thu Dec 5 14:11:35 CET 2002

On Thu, Dec 05, 2002 at 01:39:40PM +0100, K.A. Feenstra wrote:
> Yes - but that is not what I meant to say. My 'no' was in reply to
> whether rlist means something different when using 'shift' i.s.o.
> 'cut-off' Coul&vdw.

Hmm, there is something that I cannot explain. I had a simulation where
rvdw < rlist (using a hacked grompp). The suprising thing is that the
energy did not suffer any change when modifying rvdw, but was highly sensible
to changes in rlist. Why?


More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users mailing list