[gmx-users] pr_md
Luciane Vieira de Mello
mello at cenargen.embrapa.br
Fri Dec 13 15:38:17 CET 2002
hi David,
> If you do EM do you have constraints turned off? (you should...)
that's what I have in em.mdp
; OPTIONS FOR BONDS =
constraints = none
; Type of constraint algorithm =
constraint-algorithm = Lincs
; Do not constrain the start configuration =
unconstrained-start = no
; Relative tolerance of shake =
shake-tol = 1e-04
; Highest order in the expansion of the constraint coupling matrix =
lincs-order = 4
; Lincs will write a warning to the stderr if in one step a bond =
; rotates over more degrees than =
lincs-warnangle = 30
; Convert harmonic bonds to morse potentials =
morse = no
is it all right?
thanks
>
> >Thanks in advance,
> >
> >Elza
> >Federal University of Rio de Janeiro
> >Biological Physics Lab
> >
> >> On Fri, 13 Dec 2002, Luciane Vieira de Mello wrote:
> >>
> >> >Dear all,
> >> >
> >> >I am running a pr_md, and got the following message:
> >> >
> >> This doesn't happen to be the CVS version of GROMACS?
> >>
> >> If not, did your minimization work out? Did energy converge reasonably
> >> well, are forces < 1000?
> >>
> >> >Step 17782, time 35.564 (ps) LINCS WARNING
> >> >relative constraint deviation after LINCS:
> >> >max 21.626123 (between atoms 2688 and 2689) rms 0.471407
> >> >bonds that rotated more than 30 degrees:
> >> > atom 1 atom 2 angle previous, current, constraint length
> >> > 2686 2687 51.8 0.1530 0.2187 0.1530
> >> > 2687 2688 89.8 0.1530 0.6611 0.1530
> >> > 2688 2689 89.8 0.1530 3.4618 0.1530
> >> > 2689 2690 89.8 0.1470 3.0238 0.1470
> >> > 2690 2691 87.9 0.1000 0.5723 0.1000
> >> > 2690 2692 87.3 0.1340 0.9661 0.1340
> >> > 2692 2693 60.8 0.1340 0.1681 0.1340
> >> > 2692 2696 61.8 0.1340 0.1693 0.1340
> >> > 2693 2694 50.5 0.1000 0.1501 0.1000
> >> > 2693 2695 54.8 0.1000 0.1592 0.1000
> >> >
> >> >in fact I got this message several times, involving different atoms.
> >> >
> >> >the atoms involved are part of the protein, which should be
> >> >constrain in the pr_md. Shouldn't they not be affected in this step?
> >> >
> >> >Has anyone got a message like this before? it is the first time I am
> >> >seeing it.
> >> >
> >> >cheers,
> >> >+-------------------------------------------------------------------------+
> >> >| Dra. Luciane Vieira de Mello Rigden
> >> |
> >> >| e-mail: mello at cenargen.embrapa.br
> >> |
> >> >| Embrapa Recursos Geneticos e Biotecnologia
> >> |
> >> >| Parque Estacao Biologica | http://www.cenargen.embrapa.br
> >> |
> >> >| PqEB - Final - Av. W3 Norte | Phone: +55 (61)448-4741
> >> |
> >> >| 70770-900, Brasilia-D.F.-BRAZIL | Fax: +55 (61)340-3658
> >> |
> >> >+-------------------------------------------------------------------------+
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >_______________________________________________
> >> >gmx-users mailing list
> >> >gmx-users at gromacs.org
> >> >http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
> >> >Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
> >> >www interface or send it to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
> >> >
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> gmx-users mailing list
> >> gmx-users at gromacs.org
> >> http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
> >> Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
> >> www interface or send it to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
> >>
> >
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >gmx-users mailing list
> >gmx-users at gromacs.org
> >http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
> >Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
> >www interface or send it to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> gmx-users mailing list
> gmx-users at gromacs.org
> http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
> Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
> www interface or send it to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
>
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users
mailing list