[gmx-users] Hydrogen bonding
horsfield at fecit.co.uk
Wed Jan 30 11:08:56 CET 2002
On Wed, 30 Jan 2002, Daan van Aalten wrote:
> I would say that's a pretty good agreement.
> You don;t mention a few things, however:
> - what is the RESOLUTION of the complex structure you are structure with?
> Uncertainty of coordinates in X-ray structures can easily be up to 0.2
It is a 0.2nm (i.e. 2.0 Angstroms) resolution X-ray structure. This is
very coarse compared to the errors I am noting. They used structure
refinement to determine the coordinates - I am not familiar enough with
the method to know by how much this reduces error bars.
> - were the given values after EM or after MD?
Conjugate gradient energy minimization.
> - how did you generate your topology?
I started from a rigid docking calculation, optimised the resulting
geometry, solvated the complex, and re-optimised.
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users