[gmx-users] Re: [gmx-users]

[Vishal Vaidyanathan]

Hi,
  This happened when I benchmarked CVS compiles against 3.1.3 rpm
binaries. I used the villin benchmark provided with gmx and I found the
compiled version to perform at 76-78% the speed of the rpm. The configure
options were the same (none). I also checked that SSE was being used
in each case while running.
  I don't know if the same problem exists with the released src rpms.
Haven't tried yet.
  Thanks,
								Vishal


On Wed, 3 Jul 2002, Mehmet Suezen wrote:

> Vishal Vaidyanathan wrote:
> > recompiling because I don't get the same performance as the rpm binaries
> > when I compile it on Suse 8.0 (different gcc versions probably).
>
> Dear GRomacs Community
> Isn't  strange to have different performance with rpm?
> I'd expect same performance if it is compiled with same option as rpms
> created? *Frankly, I prefer to compile from scratch.
>
> cheers,
>
> Mehmet
>
>
> #exclude <windows.h>
> #exclude <micrope$oft.h>
>