[gmx-users] itp file using Gromos96 parameters
Alan Wilter Sousa da Silva
alan at biof.ufrj.br
Fri Jun 7 19:08:38 CEST 2002
Hi Anton,
Thanks a lot!
However I have a few more doubts.
In file ffG43a1bon.itp we have for Gromos bond-angle parameters:
#define ga_1 90.00 420.00
; NR(heme) - FE - NR(heme) 100
;
etc...
As I believe, grompp will read #define ga_? line with its
parameters (for ga_1: angle = 90.00 and constant = 420.00).
My Gromos96 parameters for constant are in other unit system (I
think) and correspond to the last value in the commented line, for ga_1:
; NR(heme) - FE - NR(heme) 100
so constant = 100.
What is constant according to this table? How can I achieve
these values, since I cannot see a correspondence?
Many thanks in advance.
On Wed, 5 Jun 2002, Anton Feenstra wrote:
> Alan Wilter Sousa da Silva wrote:
> >
> > I can figure out that if I include new ga_?? parameters in the
> > ffG43a1bon.itp file I could get to complete my itp drug file.
>
> Correct.
>
> > Nevertheless, would GMX understand if I explicit the parameters in the
> > drug itp file, like that?
> >
> > [ angles ]
> > ; ai aj ak funct ang. const.
> > 1 5 4 2 110.0 100.0
> > 2 6 7 2 ga_12 ; C - CH2 - OA 110.0 109.5
> > 6 7 8 2 ga_11 ;CH2 - OA - C 95.0 109.5
> > 7 8 9 2 112.0 120.0
> >
> > or I'd have change funct from 2 to 1 and so to explicit my parameters.
> > Would GMX still respect Gromos96 force field?
>
> Yes, GMX (grompp in this case) will not see a difference between the
> ga_?? defines and explicit parameters. You can choose wheter to use
> angle type 1 or 2, but 2 would be consistent with the Gromos96 (43a1)
> forcefield. Gromacs will still use all the parameters as defined in
> the Gromos96 forcefield for all interactions that you don't change
> explicitly.
--
-----------------------
Alan Wilter S. da Silva
-----------------------
Laboratório de Física Biológica
Instituto de Biofísica Carlos Chagas Filho
Universidade do Brasil/UFRJ
Rio de Janeiro, Brasil
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users
mailing list