[gmx-users] comparison of reaction field and PME
Bert de Groot
bgroot at gwdg.de
Mon Mar 4 14:09:25 CET 2002
--Yuguang Mu wrote:
>
> Dear Users,
>
> First of all thank you all for the answers for the parallel problem.
> Now we have scceed in running parallel jobs using LAM version of MPI.
>
> Here I found another thing:
>
> I check two nearlly identical simulations of peptides in DMSO
> each is 20 ps long.
>
> The other difference is the treatment of electro-static interactions
> one using reaction field (cut -off )
> rlist = 1.2
> rcoulomb = 1.2
> rvdw = 1.2
> coulombtype = Reaction-Field
>
> Aother one is PME.
> rlist = 1.2
> rcoulomb = 1.2
> rvdw = 1.2
> coulombtype = PME
> fourierspacing = 0.1
> pme_order = 4
> optimize_fft = yes
>
> The simulation results are all reasonable, no problem.
>
> But the CPU time used by PME are nearlly 4 times longer that CUT-OFF.
>
> here is the output for CUT-OFF :
> NODE (s) Real (s) (%)
> Time: 331.000 331.000 100.0
> 5:31
> (Mnbf/s) (MFlops) (ps/NODE hour) (NODE hour/ns)
> Performance: 10.283 477.522 217.523 4.597
>
> and here is PME
> NODE (s) Real (s) (%)
> Time: 1294.000 1294.000 100.0
> 21:34
> (Mnbf/s) (MFlops) (ps/NODE hour) (NODE hour/ns)
> Performance: 2.631 451.218 55.641 17.972
>
> Do you think it is normal?
> Or further optimize the FFTW codes is necassary?
>
as written in the manual, optimising the fft only makes sense for long simulations
(the fft optimisation is done only once, at the beginning, and can take quite some time).
I bet most of the CPU time in the PME simulation (20ps!) was spent on optimising the fft.
BTW I haven't seen any aplycation that gained much from the fft optimisation.
Bert
____________________________________________________________________________
Dr. Bert de Groot
Max Planck Institute for Biophysical Chemistry
Theoretical molecular biophysics group
Am Fassberg 11
37077 Goettingen, Germany
tel: +49-551-2011306, fax: +49-551-2011089
email: bgroot at gwdg.de
http://www.mpibpc.gwdg.de/abteilungen/071/bgroot
____________________________________________________________________________
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users
mailing list