[gmx-users] SPC vs tip3p for water
David van der Spoel
spoel at xray.bmc.uu.se
Wed Mar 27 21:15:57 CET 2002
On Wed, 27 Mar 2002, Erik Lindahl wrote:
>No, it's basically exactly the same water model but with very slightly
>different charges (optimized for different forcefield).
>You can compare the files spc.itp and tip3p.itp in the topology directory.
But unless you have very special reason to use Tip3p, don't. It's no good.
Checkout my water paper:
David van der Spoel, Paul J. van Maaren and Herman J.C. Berendsen, A
systematic study of water models for molecular simulation: Derivation of
water models optimized for use with a reaction field. J Chem Phys 108
(1998) 10220-10230
Groeten, David.
________________________________________________________________________
Dr. David van der Spoel, Biomedical center, Dept. of Biochemistry
Husargatan 3, Box 576, 75123 Uppsala, Sweden
phone: 46 18 471 4205 fax: 46 18 511 755
spoel at xray.bmc.uu.se spoel at gromacs.org http://zorn.bmc.uu.se/~spoel
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users
mailing list