[gmx-users] New force fields

[Mehmet Suezen]

Ram'on Garc'ia Fern'andez wrote:
> 
> On Fri, May 03, 2002 at 03:02:20PM +0200, Mehmet Suezen wrote:
> > Ram'on Garc'ia Fern'andez wrote:
> > > In addition, the procedure for adding a custom potential (that is, with
> > > a different formula) should be documented (as opposed to adding a potential
> > > defined by a table, that is well documented). More that two parameters
> > > should be allowed.
> >
> > It'd be confusing for a normal user to have a documentation on adding a
> > custom potential.
> > Rather, it might be a developers manual instead. I guess, normal user
> > (simulator)
> > should not bother about very details of the code.
> >
> 
> It is probably more frequent than you think.
> 
> You cannot get a paper published in Journal of Chemical Physics doing
> something that is straightforward. You must contribute some
> innovation. Of course, the novelty can be in the system, or in
> anything else.

How many lines did you contribute to Gromacs?

> 
> Having said that, I do not mind where is it documented. I request that
> it should be documented.
> 
> Ramon
> _______________________________________________
> gmx-users mailing list
> gmx-users at gromacs.org
> http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
> Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
> www interface or send it to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.