[gmx-users] Amber Force field in Gromacs - implicit solvent

[Erik Lindahl]

Anton Feenstra wrote:

>David wrote:
>  
>
>>On Sat, 2002-10-19 at 13:46, Stefano Piana wrote:
>>    
>>
>>>Hallo again!
>>>I would like to know the current status of the implementation of the Amber
>>>forcefield in gromos. I Read some old messages on the argument, does it
>>>already exist a version of the Amber force field written in gromacs format?
>>>      
>>>
>>The Pande group (folding.stanford.edu) have implemented both Amber and
>>Charm in GROMACS. It is currently being tested. As soon as they are
>>convinced that it works we will add it to the standard distribution.
>>    
>>
>
>Is there any preliminary version already available somewhere that
>we could already use for testing purposes?
>  
>
I'll add it to CVS when Eric Sorin has finished his internal testing.

Cheers,

Erik