[gmx-users] workaround for PME coulomb energy (fwd)

David L. Bostick dbostick at physics.unc.edu
Tue Nov 26 17:40:37 CET 2002


Hello David,

Thanks for your help with the workaround.  I have an additional question
pertaining to your last reply below:

> E(lr) = E(lr) (ion-ion) + E(lr) (ion-rest) + E(lr) (rest-rest)
> Setting the ion charge to zero will give you E(lr) (rest-rest)
> setting the rest to zero will give you E(lr) (ion-ion)
> but if you have only one ion that term will be zero. Do check the charge
> correction to PME, as that may be different when the total charge
> changes.

How do I check the charge correction to PME?

Thanks,
David

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
David Bostick					Office: 262 Venable Hall
Dept. of Physics and Astronomy			Phone:  (919)962-0165
Program in Molecular and Cellular Biophysics
UNC-Chapel Hill
CB #3255 Phillips Hall				dbostick at physics.unc.edu
Chapel Hill, NC 27599	           		http://www.unc.edu/~dbostick
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

On 23 Oct 2002, David wrote:

> On Wed, 2002-10-23 at 17:44, David L. Bostick wrote:
> >
> > Hello all,
> >
> > I am interested in using David van der Spoel's method for calculating the
> > total coulomb energy of a single ion with the rest of the system.  I just
> > want to ask a few questions so I can feel comfortable with what I'm doing.
> >
> > 1)If I take the original .edr file from the simulation, is the total
> > coulomb energy of the system Coulomb (SR) + Coulomb (LR) as extracted by
> > g_energy?  That is.. Coulomb 1-4 doesn't really factor in does it?
> In this case it is constant, yes.
>
> >
> > 2)Then if I set the ion charge to zero and rerun to generate a new .edr
> > file and calculate the total coulomb energy again as Coulomb (SR) + Coulomb
> > (LR), this will be the total PME energy for System_&_!ion-System_&_!ion?
> Coulomb (SR) you can do in groups anyway, so you can get that more
> accurate from the original run.
>
> > 3)Then I can subtract the result of #2 from the result of #1 and obtain the
> > total coulomb PME energy of System_&_!ion-ion?  Since there is only one
> > ion, the coulomb energy of ion-ion is zero so I don't have to worry about
> > it.
> E(lr) = E(lr) (ion-ion) + E(lr) (ion-rest) + E(lr) (rest-rest)
> Setting the ion charge to zero will give you E(lr) (rest-rest)
> setting the rest to zero will give you E(lr) (ion-ion)
> but if you have only one ion that term will be zero. Do check the charge
> correction to PME, as that may be different when the total charge
> changes.
>
> > 4)If I write the total ewald sum in the traditional way,
> >
> >       E = E(real) + E(reciprocal) + E(self) + E(dipole_correction)
> >
> >   is the coulomb energy as extracted by g_energy as follows:
> >
> >    Coulomb (SR) = E(real)
> >
> >   and
> >
> >    Coulomb (LR) = E(reciprocal) + E(self) + E(dipole_correction) ?
> >
> >    How exactly are these terms divided among the two quantities Coulomb(SR)
> >    and Coulomb(LR)?
> Coulomb(LR) = E(reciprocal) + E(self) + E(dipole_correction)
> Coulomb(SR) = E(real)
>
>
> Groeten, David.
> ________________________________________________________________________
> Dr. David van der Spoel, 	Biomedical center, Dept. of Biochemistry
> Husargatan 3, Box 576,  	75123 Uppsala, Sweden
> phone:	46 18 471 4205		fax: 46 18 511 755
> spoel at xray.bmc.uu.se	spoel at gromacs.org   http://zorn.bmc.uu.se/~spoel
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> _______________________________________________
> gmx-users mailing list
> gmx-users at gromacs.org
> http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
> Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
> www interface or send it to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
>





More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users mailing list