[gmx-users] Three-site model for acetonitrile
Christoph Freudenberger
christoph.freudenberger at chemie.uni-ulm.de
Mon Feb 24 20:02:10 CET 2003
Hi David,
David wrote:
> This is why I was aking about how you keep it linear. The angle will not
> work, or will be rather instable at best, since the potential is not
> continuous at 180 (i.e. angle <= 180 always). You probably want to
> define the C as a dummy particle. Note that you will have to
> redistribute the mass over N and CH3 such that centre of mass is
> unchanged and inertia tensor is not modified too much either.
I just read anything about constraints and dummies in the manual and i
think i'm beginning to understand the concept.
Does this topolgy make sense?
;------------------------------
[ atomtypes ]
;type mass charge ptype c6 c12
MeAN 20.35285 0.000 A 0.90571E-02 0.26212E-04 ; (*)
CAN 0.00000 0.000 A 0.51454E-02 0.12167E-04 ; (*)
NAN 20.69985 0.000 A 0.26955E-02 0.28943E-05 ; (*)
[ moleculetype ]
; name nrexcl
Acetonitril 2
[ atoms ]
; nr type resnr residu atom cgnr charge mass
1 MeAN 1 MeCN C1AN 1 0.206 20.35285
2 CAN 1 MeCN C2AN 1 0.247 0.000
3 NAN 1 MeCN N3AN 1 -0.453 20.69985
[ constraints ]
; ai aj funct b0
1 3 1 0.26200
[ dummies2 ]
; ai aj ak funct a
2 1 3 1 0.5572519
[ exclusions ]
1 2 3
2 3 1
3 2 1
;(*) E.Guardia, Mol. Simul. 26, 2001, 2878;
;C2AN dummified to keep the molecule linear
;-------------eof ---------------------
regards
--
Christoph Freudenberger
Abt. Organische Chemie I AK Siehl - Uni Ulm -Tel: ++49-731-502-2785
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users
mailing list