[gmx-users] Help about 2 D periodic boundary condition
Anton Feenstra
feenstra at chem.vu.nl
Tue Jan 14 10:03:39 CET 2003
David wrote:
>
> > > As for 2D PBC, it depends on what you want in the third direction.
> > > You can for example make a two 'walls' of frozen atoms above and
> > > below your system, or perhaps simply a vacuum boundary. The system
> > > will still be treated in 3D PBC, but the third dimension will not
> > > be relevant.
> So what does it mean: not relevant?
I mean that if you have two 'walls' with enough space in between,
like:
.........
. .
. .
.-------.
.#######.
.#######.
.-------.
. .
. .
.........
where ## is your system, --- is the 'wall' and ... are the box
edges, effectively there is no interaction in the third (vertical
in my drawing) dimension, so there is no effective periodicity.
--
Groetjes,
Anton
________ ___________________________________________________________
| | Anton Feenstra |
| . | Dept. of Pharmacochemistry - Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam |
| |---- | De Boelelaan 1083 - 1081 HV Amsterdam - The Netherlands |
| |---- | Tel: +31 20 44 47608 - Fax: +31 20 44 47610 |
| ' __ | Feenstra at chem.vu.nl - http://www.chem.vu.nl/afdelingen/FAR|
| / \ |-----------------------------------------------------------|
| ( ) | Dept. of Biophysical Chemistry - University of Groningen |
| \__/ | Nijenborgh 4 - 9747 AG Groningen - The Netherlands |
| __ | Tel +31 50 363 4327 - Fax +31 50 363 4800 |
| / \ | K.A.Feenstra at chem.rug.nl - http://md.chem.rug.nl/~anton |
| ( ) |-----------------------------------------------------------|
| \__/ | "I Used To Care, But Things Have Changed" (Bob Dylan) |
|________|___________________________________________________________|
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users
mailing list