[gmx-users] More EM Questions.
Christoph Freudenberger
christoph.freudenberger at chemie.uni-ulm.de
Tue Jul 15 09:36:01 CEST 2003
Joel DeWitt wrote:
> gmx-users:
>
> When I run EM on my DPPC monolayer (just 30 lipids), I get peculiar
> standard output:
>
> Steepest Descents:
> Tolerance = 1.50000e+02
> Number of steps = 1000
> Step= 0, Dmax= 1.0e-01 nm, Epot= -2.81451e+03 Fmax= 6.07879e+02, atom= 1158
> Step= 7, Dmax= 1.6e-03 nm, Epot= -2.82194e+03 Fmax= 1.15606e+03, atom= 1484
> Step= 8, Dmax= 1.9e-03 nm, Epot= -2.86810e+03 Fmax= 1.09084e+03, atom= 1484
[snip]
> I've written EM algorithms from scratch before and GROMACS obviously is
> not being thorough in its energy minimization. Sure, the potential
> energy is being reduced overall, but it doesn't seem like EM is
> examining the system as a whole; just a handful of atoms.
I always understood the em output to refer to the atom that is affected by Fmax and
not that this was the only atom to be changed.
Is this correct?
regards
--
Christoph Freudenberger
Abt. Organische Chemie I AK Siehl - Uni Ulm -Tel: ++49-731-502-2785
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users
mailing list