[gmx-users] tpbconv for following runs
Ester Chiessi
ester.chiessi at uniroma2.it
Mon Mar 10 10:05:13 CET 2003
Hi all,
I'm using tpbconv to produce an MD calculation by following runs.
To syntax is:
tpbconv -s run1.tpr -f run1.trr -extend 1.0 -o run2
Gromacs: VERSION 3.1.4 (double precision)
I have a cubic box (l=4.272 nm) of water SPC containing a linear polymer.
There are 2381 molecules, 2596 charge groups and 7564 atoms
This is at the last step of run1:
Step Time Lambda Annealing
1000 1.00000 0.00000 1.00000
Energies (kJ/mol)
Bond Angle Proper Dih. Improper Dih. LJ-14
4.92527e+02 9.06575e+02 7.93562e+02 1.01232e+02 6.11300e+01
Coulomb-14 LJ (SR) Coulomb (SR) Coulomb (LR) Potential
-7.30751e+03 1.52176e+04 -1.08284e+05 -3.44624e+03 -1.01465e+05
Kinetic En. Total Energy Temperature Pressure (bar)
1.94824e+04 -8.19828e+04 3.03304e+02 5.93431e+01
This is at the first step of run2:
......
bUncStart = TRUE
......
Step Time Lambda Annealing
0 1.00000 0.00000 1.00000
Energies (kJ/mol)
Bond Angle Proper Dih. Improper Dih. LJ-14
4.92527e+02 9.06575e+02 7.93562e+02 1.01232e+02 6.11300e+01
Coulomb-14 LJ (SR) Coulomb (SR) Coulomb (LR) Potential
-7.30751e+03 1.52176e+04 -1.08284e+05 -3.44624e+03 -1.01465e+05
Kinetic En. Total Energy Temperature Pressure (bar)
1.94640e+04 -8.20011e+04 3.03019e+02 7.98155e+01
I expected that all terms were identical, not only the potential energy
contributions.
May I consider negligible these discrepances?
Thanks
Ester
--
Ester Chiessi
Dipartimento di Scienze e Tecnologie Chimiche
Universita' di Roma "Tor Vergata"
Via della Ricerca Scientifica
00133 Roma (Italy)
http://www.stc.uniroma2.it/cfmacro/cfmacroindex.htm
e-mail: ester.chiessi at uniroma2.it
Phone: 39*6*72594462
39*6*72594874
Fax:39*6*72594328
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users
mailing list