[gmx-users] Segmentation fault 4
Tanos C. C. França
tccf at epq.ime.eb.br
Sat Mar 29 13:59:01 CET 2003
Hi Anton !!!!!!!!!
It´s the protein docked with its cofactor and coenzyme. There are two
active sites with one cofactor and one coenzyme in each one. I have
already checked the structure in ProChek and everything is OK. I have
also performed one round of steep descent EM until emtol = 1000 and
further 1000 steps of cg. I suspect that the problem is really the
molecules docked to the actives sites cause without then the dynamics
went well. I am looking now for any mistakes committed in the
parametrization and docking process.
There is another detail in my job. I had to add 12 atoms of
Na+ to neutralize the system. Could this create any problem ? If so, is
it acceptable to run the job without neutralize the system ???????
Thanks a lot for you help !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Best
Tanos C. C. Franca.
Christoph Freudenberger wrote:
> Tanos C. C. França wrote:
>>
>> I am facing the problem of segmentation fault again
>> !!!!!!!!!!!! This time I am trying to perform a Position Restrained
>> (PR) molecular dynamics (MD) of a crystallographic structure I have
[...]
> You're using
> constraints = all-bonds
> with the default LINCS algorithm. Looks like your system gives coupled
> constraints that cannot be resolved by LINCS (check the manual about
> that).
If it's just a protein, all-bonds & Lincs should work.
Perhaps there are strange things in your crystal structure.
Did you do EM before the MD? (You *must*!)
Have you checked the crystal structure with for example ProCheck?
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.465 / Virus Database: 263 - Release Date: 25/03/2003
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://maillist.sys.kth.se/pipermail/gromacs.org_gmx-users/attachments/20030329/c4acca18/attachment.html>
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users
mailing list