[gmx-users] On the use of SD and CG
Martina Bertsch, PhD
mbe404 at lulu.it.northwestern.edu
Sun Nov 16 08:51:01 CET 2003
Greetings.
First of all, thank you, David and Anton, for all your kind advice. I
know that I speak for many GMX users when I say that we have learnt a
lot from you. Special thanks to Peter and Graham for their modification
of mdrun and all the other contributions.
I have just had a very long day trying to prepare my system for the
PR-MD by SD- and CG-EM. The system was originally composed of 1 protein
molecule, 114 POPC lipids and 2460 SPC waters. First I applied the SD
algorithm (max 10000 steps, emtol = 1000 kJ mol^-1 nm^-1, initial step
size: 0.01 nm), which after ~200 steps returned a well known error message:
Stepsize too small (... nm) Converged to machine precision, but not to the requested precision (...)
At that point, I used the structure resulting from the SD as an input
for the CG-EM run (max 10000 steps, emtol = 1000 kJ mol^-1 nm^-1,
initial step size: 0.01 nm, nstcgsteep=50). This time, after ~30 steps,
I obtained another familiar message:
Fatal error: ci = -2147483648 should be in 0 .. 7999 [FILE nsgrid.c, LINE 210]
The atoms from 2 POPC and 3 waters that had large forces acting on them,
appeared to have clashes with the protein, so I deleted the
corresponding molecules from the *gro file resulting from the
interrupted CG, updated the number of atoms on line 2 of the same file,
renumbered with editconf and updated the *top file.
Then, I entered that data set into another iteration of SD and CG,
followed by deletion of overlapping lipid and solvent molecules. I
noticed that the forces were weaker, but still well above the emtol
value. Neither algorithm was achieving convergence.
I reminimized the protein itself in Insight II without any problem. Upon
reinsertion in the membrane, the forces were weaker, but eventually it
took me 9 cycles (!) of SD and CG (gradually decreasing emtol) and
deletion of unwanted molecules of POPC and water. The system eventually
converged after about 600 steps SD and 150 steps CG (combined over all
iterations) at emtol = 100. There were 108 POPCs and 2439 SOL molecules
left in the system. The potential energy was ~ -2.2*10^5.
Next, I wanted to run a PR-MD, with positional restraints imposed on the
protein, using PME, separate T coupling for each group and no p coupling
(see one of my previous messages for *pr.mdp). Since many messages in
the gmx archive stress the importance of neutralizing the system before
a PR-MD run with PME, I added 10 Cl anions to my system. But now, as you
might guess, my PR-MD simulation crashes, giving the following error:
LINCS warning: relative constraint deviation after LINCS between certain
protein and/or POPC and/or water atoms
So, I try minimizing this new system with SD, examine the resulting
structure, delete a Cl ion that got inside the protein transmembrane
cavity, reminimize using CG, delete some more POPC and water molecules,
but the system won't converge. The forces are on the order of 2000-3000.
I tried using the resulting structure as an input for PR-MD or full MD,
but could not even produce a single step.
I have a feeling this adventure should not be quite so eventful: I am
getting every single error message from the book. Any kind suggestions?
Best regards,
Martina
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users
mailing list