[gmx-users] LINCS warning
Anton Feenstra
feenstra at chem.vu.nl
Tue Sep 30 09:04:01 CEST 2003
Lakshmi Padmavathi wrote:
> Dear Gromacs users,
>
> I made the MD simulations with distance restraints between 100, 101, 168 and
> 226. i am getting this following warning. is it too serious? can i continue
> or not.? i hope any of you could help me.
>
> thank you in advance
>
> Step 46324, time 92.648 (ps) LINCS WARNING
> relative constraint deviation after LINCS:
> max 0.005035 (between atoms 100 and 102) rms 0.000117
> bonds that rotated more than 30 degrees:
> atom 1 atom 2 angle previous, current, constraint length
> 100 101 45.4 0.1091 0.1095 0.1090
It depends what type of atoms these are, and if they are anywhere
near a significant location in your system of interest. I'd suppose
they are, since you have distance restraints connected to them.
Generally speaking, a Lincs Warning is *serious*. It means a bond
(e.g. N-H, C-O) and the corresponding atom(s) have rotated for more
than 30 degrees, which means you are far from a step size that would
ensure energy conservation. Having said that, I have often ignored
them, for example if it is a solvent-exposed -NH3 group, while I am
only interested in the enzym active site in the interior of the
protein. It also depends if the warning is persistent. I see them
often during the first 10's of ps, but if they disappear quickly
and are far from the important areas, I feel it safe to ignore.
--
Groetjes,
Anton
_____________ _______________________________________________________
| | |
| _ _ ___,| K. Anton Feenstra |
| / \ / \'| | | Dept. of Pharmacochem. - Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam |
|( | )| | | De Boelelaan 1083 - 1081 HV Amsterdam - Netherlands |
| \_/ \_/ | | | Tel: +31 20 44 47608 - Fax: +31 20 44 47610 |
| | Feenstra at chem.vu.nl - www.chem.vu.nl/~feenstra/ |
| | "If You See Me Getting High, Knock Me Down" |
| | (Red Hot Chili Peppers) |
|_____________|_______________________________________________________|
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users
mailing list