[gmx-users] Re: implicit solvent and REMD
David van der Spoel
spoel at xray.bmc.uu.se
Tue Apr 27 09:53:03 CEST 2004
On Fri, 2004-04-23 at 17:53, Anton Feenstra wrote:
> Xavier Periole wrote:
>
> > Wei Fu wrote:
> >
> >> Hi, I want to observe the unfolded state of a protein with 370 residues,
> >>
> > unfolded stateSSSSSSS !!! For sure a 370 residues protein must have a lot of
> > unfolded states. I think that this information is unaccessible at the time except
> > if you have thousands of processors available for a long time.
>
> For given unfolding conditions (e.g., high T, high P, high Urea), there
> is *one* unfolded state. (By definition!)
Just to be somewhat pedantic...
Says who?
Don't you always have an equilibrium of conformations, i.e. some are
folded some are not?
--
David.
________________________________________________________________________
David van der Spoel, PhD, Assist. Prof., Molecular Biophysics group,
Dept. of Cell and Molecular Biology, Uppsala University.
Husargatan 3, Box 596, 75124 Uppsala, Sweden
phone: 46 18 471 4205 fax: 46 18 511 755
spoel at xray.bmc.uu.se spoel at gromacs.org http://xray.bmc.uu.se/~spoel
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users
mailing list