[gmx-users] free energy and soft core
Frauke Meyer
fmeyer at iris3.simm.ac.cn
Tue Aug 10 10:47:22 CEST 2004
Dear Berk,
> >free_energy = yes
> >init_lambda = 0
> >delta_lambda = 0
> >
> >
>
> >
> >dG/dl is different for both, which is alright.
> > alpha=0 alpha=1.5
> > @TYPE xy @TYPE xy
> > 0 173.378 0 173.378
> > 0.002 170.874 0.002 -7.056
> > 0.004 168.351 0.004 -7.9578
> > 0.006 166.028 0.006 -8.24761
> > ....
> >
> >
> >But should not the potential energy itself be identical for lambda=0?
> >What am I doing wrong?
>
> Are the above results with delta-lambda=0?
> If delta-lambda=0 and thus lambda=0 the results should be
> identical, including dvdlambda. mdrun will use the non-softcore
> innerloops for lambda=0, so the results should really be identical.
> But from the huge jump from t=0 to 0.002 I would guess delta-lambda
> is not zero.
> I just recalled that I have fixed a bug in cvs with free-energy
> and rcoulomb<rvdw. But as far as I know this bug always caused
> a segmentation violation.
> Is rcoulomb<rvdw in your simulations?
>
> >
Yes above results are for delta-lambda=0 - that is what I am wondering
about. As a test I did the same without solvent, one molecule in a box
without pbc, but have the same difference when I change from hard-core
to soft-core
alpha=0 alpha=1.5
0 12.7774 0 12.7774
0.002 12.3728 0.002 -3.20253
0.004 11.9785 0.004 -3.6638
0.006 11.6088 0.006 -4.07433
0.008 11.2765 0.008 -4.41497
0.01 10.9911 0.01 -4.67666
My molecule just has a few charges of which the interaction are excluded
(Coulomb1-4=CoulombLR=CoulombSR = 0), so it's all about the LJ
interactions within the molecule.
I could reproduce the bug that you mentioned if rcoulomb<rvdw.
This looks to me like another bug..?
This is my topology:
[ atoms ]
; nr type resnr residue atom cgnr charge mass
typeB chargeB massB
1 H 1 BOM H1 1 0.398 1.008
DUM 0 1.008 ; qtot 0.398
2 OA 1 BOM O1 1 -0.548 15.9994
DUM 0 15.9994 ; qtot -0.15
3 CH2 1 BOM C2 1 0.15 14.027
DUM 0 14.027 ; qtot 0
4 CH2 1 BOM C4 2 0 14.027
DUM 0 14.027 ; qtot 0
5 CH2 1 BOM C7 3 0 14.027
DUM 0 14.027 ; qtot 0
6 CH2 1 BOM C10 4 0 14.027
DUM 0 14.027 ; qtot 0
7 CH2 1 BOM C13 5 0 14.027
DUM 0 14.027 ; qtot 0
8 CH2 1 BOM C16 6 0 14.027
DUM 0 14.027 ; qtot 0
9 CH2 1 BOM C19 7 0 14.027
DUM 0 14.027 ; qtot 0
10 CH2 1 BOM C22 8 0 14.027
DUM 0 14.027 ; qtot 0
11 CH2 1 BOM C25 9 0 14.027
DUM 0 14.027 ; qtot 0
12 CH1 1 BOM C28 10 0 13.019
DUM 0 13.019 ; qtot 0
13 CH1 1 BOM C31 11 0 13.019
DUM 0 13.019 ; qtot 0
14 CH1 1 BOM C33 12 0 13.019
DUM 0 13.019 ; qtot 0
15 CH1 1 BOM C35 13 0 13.019
DUM 0 13.019 ; qtot 0
16 CH2 1 BOM C37 14 0 14.027
DUM 0 14.027 ; qtot 0
17 CH2 1 BOM C39 15 0 14.027
DUM 0 14.027 ; qtot 0
18 CH3 1 BOM C42 16 0 15.035
DUM 0 15.035 ; qtot 0
Frauke
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users
mailing list