[gmx-users] Energy minimizations with gmx3.2
Marc Vogt
mvogt at es.chem.umass.edu
Mon May 17 15:51:19 CEST 2004
No I had not been able to find any solutions in the archive, but I tried
just now and although the minimization ran for 252 steps in 3.2.1
with define = -DFLEXIBLE instead of 37 steps for define = -DFLEX_SPC,
it still failed.:
With 3.2.1 and define = -DFLEXIBLE and contraints=none
--------------------------------------------------------------
Step= 251, Dmax= 1.7e-06 nm, Epot= -1.79236e+05 Fmax= 2.01564e+03, atom= 68
Stepsize too small, or no change in energy.
Converged to machine precision,
but not to the requested precision Fmax < 1000
Double precision normally gives you higher accuracy.
writing lowest energy coordinates.
Back Off! I just backed up test.gro to ./#test.gro.2#
Steepest Descents converged to machine precision in 252 steps,
but did not reach the requested Fmax < 1000.
Potential Energy = -1.7923609e+05
Maximum force = 2.0180422e+03 on atom 68
Norm of force = 9.6549727e+03
With 3.1.4 and define=DFLEX_SPC
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Step= 109, Dmax= 6.4e-03 nm, Epot= -1.75318e+05 Fmax= 9.59784e+02, atom= 6814
writing lowest energy coordinates.
Back Off! I just backed up mintraj.trr to ./#mintraj.trr.2#
Back Off! I just backed up test.gro to ./#test.gro.3#
Steepest Descents converged to 1000 in 110 steps
Potential Energy = -1.75318e+05
Maximum force: 9.59784e+02
-----------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Other than the define= field, the mdp is the same
title = testww
cpp = /lib/cpp
define = -DFLEX_SPC
constraints = none
integrator = steep
dt = 0.002 ; ps !
nsteps = 1000
nstlist = 10
ns_type = grid
rlist = 1.0
rcoulomb = 1.0
rvdw = 1.0
;
; Energy minimizing stuff
;
emtol = 1000.0
emstep = 0.01
epsilon_r = 1
thanks,
Marc
>
> On Mon, 2004-05-17 at 15:05, Marc Vogt wrote:
> > I had the same problem using DFLEX_SPC. Never could resolve it
> > along with a restart problem. Both in 3.2.1.
> > Consequently, I'm still using 3.1.4.
> Have you tried
> define = -DFLEXIBLE
> constraints = none
> >
> > Marc
> >
> > >
> > > Which water model you use?
> > > I encountered the same problem when using TIP4P.
> > >
> > > Tanos wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi folks,
> > > > Since I started to use gmx 3.2 my energy minimizations stopped to
> > > > converge to emtol. All of them have converged to the machine precision
> > > > !!!!!! Is that happening to someone else ??? If ss, does someone knows
> > > > the reason ?????
> > > > Thanks in advance.
> > > > Tanos C. C. Franca - IME
> > > > Rio de Janeiro - RJ
> > > > Brazil
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > gmx-users mailing list
> > > > gmx-users at gromacs.org
> > > > http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
> > > > Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www
> > > > interface or send it to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
> > > >
> > > > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > > This Mail Was Scanned By Mail-seCure System
> > > > at the Tel-Aviv University CC.
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > gmx-users mailing list
> > > gmx-users at gromacs.org
> > > http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
> > > Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
> > > www interface or send it to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
> > >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > gmx-users mailing list
> > gmx-users at gromacs.org
> > http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
> > Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
> > www interface or send it to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
> --
> David.
> ________________________________________________________________________
> David van der Spoel, PhD, Assoc. Prof., Molecular Biophysics group,
> Dept. of Cell and Molecular Biology, Uppsala University.
> Husargatan 3, Box 596, 75124 Uppsala, Sweden
> phone: +46 18 471 4205 fax: +46 18 511 755
> spoel at xray.bmc.uu.se spoel at gromacs.org http://xray.bmc.uu.se/~spoel
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>
> _______________________________________________
> gmx-users mailing list
> gmx-users at gromacs.org
> http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
> Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
> www interface or send it to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
>
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users
mailing list