[gmx-users] positional restraint
Alok
alokjain at iitk.ac.in
Thu Nov 25 12:58:03 CET 2004
hello gmx uers,
I have a problem concerning positional restraint
. I am constraining a residue from my protein during minimization and
consequently during the early stage of my dynamics. I have consequently
constructed an ".itp file" for the purpose of positional restraint of
the residue which i then add to the ".top file".
The .itp file is as shown below:
; In this topology include file, you will find position restraint
; entries for all the heavy atoms in your original pdb file.
; This means that all the protons which were added by pdb2gmx are
; not restrained.
[ position_restraints ]
; atom type fx fy fz
691 1 100000 100000 100000
692 1 100000 100000 100000
693 1 100000 100000 100000
694 1 100000 100000 100000
695 1 100000 100000 100000
696 1 100000 100000 100000
697 1 100000 100000 100000
698 1 100000 100000 100000
699 1 100000 100000 100000
700 1 100000 100000 100000
701 1 100000 100000 100000
The output data that i get after preprocessing my input files for
minimization is as follows:
processing coordinates...
double-checking input for internal consistency...
Reading position restraint coords from out2sxl.gro
renumbering atomtypes...
converting bonded parameters...
# BONDS: 39330
# G96BONDS: 2817
# ANGLES: 26220
# G96ANGLES: 5464
# PDIHS: 2470
# IDIHS: 2285
# LJ14: 4581
# POSRES: 22
Here i observe that the POSRES: 22 value is twice the number of atoms
of the residue (11 atoms) I want to constrain.
Also the values reported for the other terms like BONDS,ANGLES, etc
looks not to tally with the actual number present in the system.
I tried preprocessing the input files with different number of atoms in
the ".itp file" but everytime the POSRES value is twice the actual
number of atoms.
Can anyone please tell me the reason for this ???????
Also i would like to mention that if i still run the Mdrun program i get
the position restraint energy term in my energy list output file which
suggest that my constrain in functioning.Still I am confused about the
number of atoms reported for constraining after preprocessing.
Thanking you,
Alok jain
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users
mailing list