[gmx-users] RE: Insertion of protein in lipid bilayer
nextgame at hotmail.com
Thu Aug 4 20:38:10 CEST 2005
Thank you Dr. G, Smith. I fixed the problem in lipids jumping around, and
was able to obtain 1 ns of md (make_hole version) for the membrane with the
hole alone. The membrane seemed to be stable as the bilayer stayed where
they were supposed to this time and boy did I ever enjoy the trajectory
movie. However, upon further inspection, the hole had "sealed up" at the end
of the simulation. The hole I created using the make_hole.pl before running
the md had been filled by surrounding lipids. This led me to think that
maybe the exclusion forces of the protein surface are not correct (could be
due to user error on my part when using MSMS?). I examined the
insidesurf.pdb and molsurfpdb.pdb using vmd and couldn't figure out what I
should be looking for.
So my questions are:
1) How can I use the information of insidsurf.pdb and molsurfpdb.pdb (maybe
perhaps gsurf.log) to convince myself that the calculated forces are indeed
"reasonable". In the tutorial it says that the forces of the insidesurf.pdb
should be pointing outward at the right residues, but I couldn't see any
directions. I.e, what would be a sanity test here?
2) Any other reasons why the hole grew back together?
>From: "Graham Smith" <graham.smith at biiuk.com>
>Reply-To: Discussion list for GROMACS users <gmx-users at gromacs.org>
>To: <gmx-users at gromacs.org>
>Subject: [gmx-users] RE: Insertion of protein in lipid bilayer Date: Tue,
>2 Aug 2005 21:40:23 +0100
>Received: from elvira.ekonomikum.uu.se ([18.104.22.168]) by
>mc10-f16.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Tue, 2 Aug 2005
>Received: by elvira.ekonomikum.uu.se (Postfix, from userid 204)id 6B959392;
>Tue, 2 Aug 2005 22:40:47 +0200 (MSZ)
>Received: from elvira.ekonomikum.uu.se(127.0.0.1) by
>elvira.ekonomikum.uu.se via virus-scan id s26635; Tue, 2 Aug 05 22:40:37
>Received: from xray.bmc.uu.se (xray.bmc.uu.se [22.214.171.124])by
>elvira.ekonomikum.uu.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF91237A;Tue, 2 Aug 2005
>22:40:35 +0200 (MSZ)
>Received: from xray.bmc.uu.se (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])by
>xray.bmc.uu.se (Postfix) with ESMTPid 1BDBB25080; Tue, 2 Aug 2005 22:40:35
>Received: from elvira.ekonomikum.uu.se
>(elvira.ekonomikum.uu.se[126.96.36.199]) by xray.bmc.uu.se (Postfix) with
>ESMTP id BEB402473Ffor <gmx-users at gromacs.org>; Tue, 2 Aug 2005 22:40:32
>Received: by elvira.ekonomikum.uu.se (Postfix, from userid 204)id AF185389;
>Tue, 2 Aug 2005 22:40:32 +0200 (MSZ)
>Received: from elvira.ekonomikum.uu.se(127.0.0.1) by
>elvira.ekonomikum.uu.sevia virus-scan id s26652; Tue, 2 Aug 05 22:40:28
>Received: from SRV1950.biiuk.com (unknown [188.8.131.52])by
>elvira.ekonomikum.uu.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A178217for
><gmx-users at gromacs.org>; Tue, 2 Aug 2005 22:40:27 +0200 (MSZ)
>Received: from srv1910.biiuk.com ([10.15.1.1]) by SRV1950
>withtrend_isnt_name_B; Tue, 02 Aug 2005 21:40:23 +0100
>X-Original-To: gmx-users at gromacs.org
>Delivered-To: gmx-users at xray.bmc.uu.se
>X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.7226.0
>X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Insertion of protein
>in lipid bilayer Thread-Index: AcWUh1Scl5R9BdZVRXW3uysPge8SLwDF3Z1w
>X-BeenThere: gmx-users at gromacs.org
>List-Id: Discussion list for GROMACS users <gmx-users.gromacs.org>
><http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users>,<mailto:gmx-users-request at gromacs.org?subject=unsubscribe>
>List-Post: <mailto:gmx-users at gromacs.org>
>List-Help: <mailto:gmx-users-request at gromacs.org?subject=help>
><http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users>,<mailto:gmx-users-request at gromacs.org?subject=subscribe>
>Errors-To: gmx-users-bounces at gromacs.org
>Return-Path: gmx-users-bounces at gromacs.org
>X-OriginalArrivalTime: 02 Aug 2005 20:41:18.0899 (UTC)
> > I did follow the position restraint step in my run by restricting P8
> > z direction. What happened was that the 2 popc layers flipped right
> > bat in the md so that the head groups and water from each layer were
> > each other while the hydrophobic tails from each layer were situated
> > away from each other as possible. It was really quite bizzare and
> > getting a few chuckles from it, I'd like to find out what I did wrong.
> > is what I did:
> > 1) got the 128 popc pdb and itp from Sir Tieleman, used
> > forcefields
>I think they haven't "really" done that, you've probably got an illusion
>due to periodic boundary conditions (sketch your system replicated along
>z and you'll see what I mean). The simulation you've got isn't wrong but
>you may want to change the coord file and repeat it so things look more
>normal. See note (c) below ...
> > 2) followed the how-to html to create holes using msms.
> > A few questions here:
> > a) should I minimize the new membrane with hole?
>It won't do any harm, but it might well work without it anyway.
> > b) how critical is removing all the possible lipids that may clash
> > protein?
>Not at all. The whole idea is that it will push the remaining ones out.
> > c) I simply used vmd to manually put my proteins into the membrane
> > saved the coordinate of the protein in a seperate file. Then I copied
> > pasted the simulation box size from the membrane pdb file to the top
> > protein file. Is this acceptable? What would be the most bullet-proof
> > approach?
>Moving files around with vmd could perhaps be the source of the apparent
>"flipping" of the lipids - e.g. if it has centered something at (0,0,0);
>gromacs avoids -ve coordinates and wraps them round into the next
>periodic image. I generally use editconf -center [rvec] or editconf -c
>to move things around, then subsequently concatenate the pdb files and
>view the result to check I've got it right.
> > 3) grompp and mdrun using the following parameters.
> > run.mdp
> > A few questions here too:
> > a) what would typical values be for the tau_p and tau_t?
>I use tau-t = 0.1 and tau-p = 1.0 with Berendsen coupling but I don't
>think it's critical, especially in an unphysical simulation like this.
> > 4) I havn't got to this step yet but after the hole has been generated
> > successfully generated in the membrane, do I append the protein.pdb
> > the end of the membrane_hole.pdb file and run a normal em/md to the
>Yes. Well, I normally put the protein first, but the order of the
>components (protein, lipid, water, ions if you have them) doesn't
>matter, as long as they're the same in the pdb file and the topology.
>Dr Graham R. Smith
>Biosystems Informatics Institute
>Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 4EP
>The information contained in this e-mail and any files transmitted with it
>and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
>are addressed. If
>you are not the intended recipient or have received this communication in
>notify the sender by e-mail or telephone (+44 (0)191 211 2560) and delete
>it from your
>system and destroy any copies of it. Any copying, retransmission,
>taken, or omitted to be taken, in reliance upon it is strictly prohibited
>and may be unlawful.
>Please note that whilst steps have been taken by BII to ensure that this
>attachments are virus free, neither BII nor the sender accepts
>responsibility for viruses
>and the recipient should ensure that the e-mail and attachments (if any)
>gmx-users mailing list
>gmx-users at gromacs.org
>Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
>www interface or send it to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users