[gmx-users] Zinc-coordinated protein simulation
Sandeep Somani
ssomani at bii.a-star.edu.sg
Mon Aug 22 12:09:46 CEST 2005
For Zn parameters you may also refer to
"Zn protein simulations including charge transfer and local polarization
effects"
J Am Chem Soc. 2005 Apr 6;127(13):4921-9.
Sakharov DV, Lim C.
-sandeep
> -----Original Message-----
> From: gmx-users-bounces at gromacs.org
> [mailto:gmx-users-bounces at gromacs.org] On Behalf Of Maik Goette
> Sent: Friday, August 19, 2005 9:02 PM
> To: Discussion list for GROMACS users
> Subject: Re: [gmx-users] Zinc-coordinated protein simulation
>
>
> The method, David mentioned is a third possibility.
> It depends, what goal you want to achieve.
> If the Zinc is complexed and "just" important to stabilize
> your structure, the bonded method also works. The problem
> with that method is, that, as I know, no parameters are
> available. I took the mean of the distances in the crystal
> structure as bond length and a weak force constant, which I
> took by intuition...:). I did the same for the angles. I
> think, you don't have to care about the dihedrals...It worked
> fine with no settings (so GROMACS sets 0s, when I remember
> correctly). The charge on the zinc shouldn't be 2, according
> to severeal papers, which used that method. with a charge of
> around .7 it worked fine. Don't forget to spread the opposing
> charges equally to the 4 complexing atoms, to achieve a 0
> total charge. If your zinc has a catalytical function, you
> should try the dummy method. This never worked for me, but as
> I now know, I made fatal mistakes in configuring it. So just
> give it a try...I will do that in the future again, but at
> the moment, this has no priority.
>
> Regards
>
> Maik Goette, Dipl. Biol.
> Max Planck Institute for Biophysical Chemistry
> Theoretical & computational biophysics department
> Am Fassberg 11
> 37077 Goettingen
> Germany
> Tel. : ++49 551 201 2310
> Fax : ++49 551 201 2302
> Email : mgoette[at]mpi-bpc.mpg.de
> mgoette2[at]gwdg.de
> WWW : http://www.mpibpc.gwdg.de/groups/grubmueller/
>
>
> Linda wrote:
> > Dear gmx user,
> >
> > I just searched gmx mailing list about the
> zinc-coordinated enzyme
> > simulation, it seems that most people encouter the problem that the
> > zinc goes away from coordinated residue (Cys/His) in enzyme. I saw
> > some people tried to solve this problem with two methods:
> 1. cationic
> > dummy atom method. 2. bonded zinc with His or Cys. I wonder someone
> > has succeeded? If so, would you please share your
> experience? Thanks.
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Linda
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > gmx-users mailing list
> > gmx-users at gromacs.org
> > http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
> > Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
> > www interface or send it to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
> >
> > .
> >
> _______________________________________________
> gmx-users mailing list
> gmx-users at gromacs.org
> http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-> users
> Please
> don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
> www interface or send it to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
>
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users
mailing list