[gmx-users] Cutoff length
David van der Spoel
spoel at xray.bmc.uu.se
Mon Dec 5 14:34:30 CET 2005
Xavier Periole wrote:
> All this is pretty interesting !!
>
>> coulombtype = Reaction-Field
>> rcoulomb = 1.8
>
>
> Why so long ?
>
>> epsilon_r = 100.0
>
>
> Which solvent is this supposed to represent ?
>
>> vdwtype = Cut-off
>> rvdw = 1.0
>
>
> extremely short !
>
>>
>> dispcorr = no
>
>
> May be you have to check a paper that discribe the force field
> you use and get the same parameters ... You can change the
> properties of you force field by changing the size of a cut-off.
> Longer is not necerally better !!!
Which is described in some detail in our recent paper on water simulations:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ct0502256
We also describe there the effect of using a reaction field dielectric
constant less than infinite. Our conclusion is that these should be avoided.
>
> XAvier
>
--
David.
________________________________________________________________________
David van der Spoel, PhD, Assoc. Prof., Molecular Biophysics group,
Dept. of Cell and Molecular Biology, Uppsala University.
Husargatan 3, Box 596, 75124 Uppsala, Sweden
phone: 46 18 471 4205 fax: 46 18 511 755
spoel at xray.bmc.uu.se spoel at gromacs.org http://xray.bmc.uu.se/~spoel
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users
mailing list