[gmx-users] Re. genbox -shell

[David van der Spoel]

Mark Abraham wrote:
> Dongsheng Zhang wrote:
> 
>> Dear David,
>>
>> I am confused by your reply. In your tutorial, you use
>> editconf .. -c -d 0.5
>>
>> Now I am using -d 1.0, and 1.0 nm = 10 A, I don't understand why you
>> think the box is too small.
> 
> 
> A pertinent question is whether your shell is large enough to model 
> long-range electrostatics reasonably. I suspect you'd have a heavy 
> majority of people in this decade thinking that 1.0nm is not enough.
> 
but this was an extended peptide, and it will collapse. Good way to make 
a starting structure for folding simulations.


> Mark
> _______________________________________________
> gmx-users mailing list
> gmx-users at gromacs.org
> http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
> Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www 
> interface or send it to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.


-- 
David.
________________________________________________________________________
David van der Spoel, PhD, Assoc. Prof., Molecular Biophysics group,
Dept. of Cell and Molecular Biology, Uppsala University.
Husargatan 3, Box 596,  	75124 Uppsala, Sweden
phone:	46 18 471 4205		fax: 46 18 511 755
spoel at xray.bmc.uu.se	spoel at gromacs.org   http://xray.bmc.uu.se/~spoel
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++