[gmx-users] FEP w/ monovalent ion (addendum)

David L. Bostick dbostick at physics.unc.edu
Sat Jun 11 03:29:16 CEST 2005


Also, this business of doing FEP with an ion is new to me.  If anyone can
offer warnings/caveats for these types of (charged) simulations, or has
done this in the past, I would appreciate any kind of advice.

Thanks,
David



-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
David Bostick					Office: 262 Venable Hall
Dept. of Physics and Astronomy			Phone:  (919)962-0165
Program in Molecular and Cellular Biophysics
UNC-Chapel Hill
CB #3255 Phillips Hall				dbostick at physics.unc.edu
Chapel Hill, NC 27599	           		http://www.unc.edu/~dbostick
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

On Fri, 10 Jun 2005, David L. Bostick wrote:

>
> Hello,
>
> I wish to charge/discharge a monovalent ion in order to do a FEP study. I
> know that in the current CVS code, the ewald contribution to the free
> energy is now computed. However, are corrections to the net charge now
> implemented to remove the effect of the "neutralizing plasma" inherent to
> ewald, as I vary the rxn coordinate, lambda, from 0->1 in tinfoil boundary
> conditions?
>
> If it has been implemented, is there a publication that has been followed?
> I am aware of the work of, for example, Gerhard Hummer,
> and of Tom Darden.  There is also a paper by Stephen Bogusz, Thomas
> Cheatem, and Bernie Brooks (J. Phys. Chem. (1998) 108(17) p. 7070, that
> describes a charge correction method.  Is something like this employed?
>
> Thanks,
> David.
>
> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
> David Bostick					Office: 262 Venable Hall
> Dept. of Physics and Astronomy			Phone:  (919)962-0165
> Program in Molecular and Cellular Biophysics
> UNC-Chapel Hill
> CB #3255 Phillips Hall				dbostick at physics.unc.edu
> Chapel Hill, NC 27599	           		http://www.unc.edu/~dbostick
> =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
> _______________________________________________
> gmx-users mailing list
> gmx-users at gromacs.org
> http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
> Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
> www interface or send it to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
>



More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users mailing list