[gmx-users] Apples-to-Apples comparison for dpcc benchmark
nmoore at physics.umn.edu
Thu Jun 16 16:33:07 CEST 2005
Thanks for the reply.
> David wrote:
>>>Are there any
>>>other optimization options I should be aware of when making a
>> This is all.
> Well, as Berk hinted, there will be drastic changes in the upcoming new
> version, like domain composition, threading. Sorry to say I don't know
> more details about it.
> Additionally, but these you must surely be aware of already, there are
> of course the compiler, compiler options, and of course the (mpi)
> communication. In the commonly used lam-mpi or mpi-ch, there are a
> number of parameters that you can tune, mainly to minimize latency
> (bandwidth is generally not an issue).
> * NOTE: New Phone & Fax numbers (below) *
> _____________ _______________________________________________________
> | | |
> | _ _ ___,| K. Anton Feenstra |
> | / \ / \'| | | Dept. of Pharmacochem. - Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam |
> |( | )| | | De Boelelaan 1083 - 1081 HV Amsterdam - Netherlands |
> | \_/ \_/ | | | Tel: +31 20 59 87608 - Fax: +31 20 59 87610 |
> | | Feenstra at few.vu.nl - www.few.vu.nl/~feenstra/ |
> | | "If You See Me Getting High, Knock Me Down" (RHCP) |
> gmx-users mailing list
> gmx-users at gromacs.org
> Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
> www interface or send it to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users